Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system

被引:86
|
作者
Semenenko, Vladimir A. [1 ]
Reitz, Bodo [2 ]
Day, Ellen [2 ]
Qi, X. Sharon [1 ]
Miften, Moyed [3 ]
Li, X. Allen [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
cancer; collimators; dosimetry; optimisation; radiation therapy; tumours;
D O I
10.1118/1.3013556
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new inverse treatment planning system (TPS) for external beam radiation therapy with high energy photons is commercially available that utilizes both dose-volume-based cost functions and a selection of cost functions which are based on biological models. The purpose of this work is to evaluate quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans resulting from the use of biological cost functions in comparison to plans designed using a traditional TPS employing dose-volume-based optimization. Treatment planning was performed independently at two institutions. For six cancer patients, including head and neck (one case from each institution), prostate, brain, liver, and rectal cases, segmental multileaf collimator IMRT plans were designed using biological cost functions and compared with clinically used dose-based plans for the same patients. Dose-volume histograms and dosimetric indices, such as minimum, maximum, and mean dose, were extracted and compared between the two types of treatment plans. Comparisons of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD), a previously proposed plan quality index (fEUD), target conformity and heterogeneity indices, and the number of segments and monitor units were also performed. The most prominent feature of the biologically based plans was better sparing of organs at risk (OARs). When all plans from both institutions were combined, the biologically based plans resulted in smaller EUD values for 26 out of 33 OARs by an average of 5.6 Gy (range 0.24 to 15 Gy). Owing to more efficient beam segmentation and leaf sequencing tools implemented in the biologically based TPS compared to the dose-based TPS, an estimated treatment delivery time was shorter in most (five out of six) cases with some plans showing up to 50% reduction. The biologically based plans were generally characterized by a smaller conformity index, but greater heterogeneity index compared to the dose-based plans. Overall, compared to plans based on dose-volume optimization, plans with equivalent target coverage obtained using the biologically based TPS demonstrate improved dose distributions for the majority of normal structures.
引用
收藏
页码:5851 / 5860
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Commissioning of modulator-based IMRT with XiO treatment planning system
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Obata, Yasunori
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (01) : 261 - 269
  • [32] Treatment planning evaluation and optimization should be biologically and not dose/volume based
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Mayo, Charles S.
    Orton, Colin G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 2753 - 2756
  • [33] Evaluation of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Three Different Commercial Planning Systems for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
    Liu, D.
    Chi, Z.
    Yang, H.
    Miao, M.
    Jing, Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3237 - 3237
  • [34] A Planning Quality Evaluation Tool for Adaptive IMRT Treatment Based on Machine Learning
    Zhu, X.
    Li, T.
    Thongphiew, D.
    Ge, Y.
    Yin, F.
    Wu, Q.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3400 - +
  • [35] Evaluation of conventional versus IMRT based Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation treatment planning
    Thogersen, E. H.
    Holm, A. I. S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S978 - S979
  • [36] Commercial IMRT treatment-planning dose-calculation algorithm
    Low, DA
    Mutic, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04): : 933 - 937
  • [37] IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system
    Boudreau, C
    Heath, E
    Seuntjens, J
    Ballivy, O
    Parker, W
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05): : 879 - 890
  • [38] Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial inverse treatment planning system: UAB experience
    Duan, J
    Brezovich, IA
    Pareek, PN
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 1162 - 1164
  • [39] Treatment planning system evaluation for mesothelioma IMRT (vol 49, pg 75, 2005)
    Stevens, CW
    Wong, PF
    Rice, D
    Jeter, M
    Forster, K
    Zhu, XR
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 50 (03) : 425 - 425
  • [40] The assessment and pre-clinical evaluation of an inverse treatment planning system for SMLC IMRT
    Kelly, C
    Thirion, P
    Petnehazi, C
    O'Neill, L
    Buckney, S
    Mc Clean, B
    Armstrong, A
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S77 - S77