A scalable bonding technique for the development of next-generation brain-machine interfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Pingyu [1 ]
Goh, Timothy [1 ]
Hemed, Nofar [1 ]
Melosh, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER) | 2019年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1109/ner.2019.8716886
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have demonstrated potential both for neuroscience studies and for neural-prosthetic or therapeutic devices. Given the high density of brain neurons, engineering a dense array of neural recording sites across a large brain region is important for BMIs with significantly improved capabilities such as high-dexterity motor control. In our development of a high-channel-count and high-density BMI system using complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) arrays mated with massively parallel microelectrodes, we determined that the connection between the microelectrode and chip interface (MCI) is a crucial process for device performance and scalability. Here we report our results extending flip chip bonding technique to establish the electrical connections en masse at the MCI. Key parameters affecting bonding quality were identified and optimized, and the quality of bonding was evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). With proper packaging, the bonding technique can be directly transferred to the fabrication of high-channel-count BMIs and standardized for broader applications where interconnection between massively parallel interfaces is required.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 866
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prerequesites for Symbiotic Brain-Machine Interfaces
    Sanchez, Justin C.
    Principe, Jose C.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 1736 - +
  • [22] The future of brain-machine interfaces is optical
    Ersaro, Nathan Tessema
    Yalcin, Cem
    Muller, Rikky
    NATURE ELECTRONICS, 2023, 6 (02) : 96 - 98
  • [23] Brain-Machine Interfaces: Basis and Advances
    Becedas, Jonathan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2012, 42 (06): : 825 - 836
  • [24] Brain-Machine Interfaces: The Role of the Neurosurgeon
    Chari, Aswin
    Budhdeo, Sanjay
    Sparks, Rachel
    Barone, Damiano G.
    Marcus, Hani J.
    Pereira, Erlick A. C.
    Tisdall, Martin M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 : 140 - 147
  • [25] The Next-Generation Brain Machine Interface System For Neuroscience Research and Neuroprosthetics Development
    Van der Spiegel, Jan
    Zhang, Milin
    Liu, Xilin
    2017 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIC (ASICON), 2017, : 436 - 439
  • [26] Brain-machine-brain interfaces as the foundation for the next generation of neuroprostheses
    Miguel A.L.Nicolelis
    NationalScienceReview, 2022, 9 (10) : 8 - 10
  • [27] Brain-machine-brain interfaces as the foundation for the next generation of neuroprostheses
    Nicolelis, Miguel A. L.
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 9 (10)
  • [28] Brain-machine interfaces from motor to mood
    Shanechi, Maryam M.
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 22 (10) : 1554 - 1564
  • [29] Neuroplasticity subserving the operation of brain-machine interfaces
    Oweiss, Karim G.
    Badreldin, Islam S.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2015, 83 : 161 - 171
  • [30] Toward Clinically Viable Brain-Machine Interfaces
    Shenoy, Krishna V.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (09) : 193S - 193S