A quasi-sequential approach to large-scale dynamic optimization problems

被引:59
|
作者
Hong, WR
Wang, SQ
Li, P [1 ]
Wozny, G
Biegler, LT
机构
[1] Tech Univ Ilmenau, Inst Automat & Syst Engn, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Natl Lab Ind Control Technol, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Proc & Plant Technol, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
dynamic optimization; quasi-sequential approach; nonlinear programming; collocation;
D O I
10.1002/aic.10625
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A novel sequential approach for solving dynamic optimization problems containing path constraints on state variables is presented and its performance analyzed. As in the simultaneous approach, we discretize both state and control variables using collocation on finite elements, so that path constraints can be guaranteed inside each element. The state variables are solved in a manner similar to that in the sequential approach; this eliminates the discretized differential-algebraic equations and state variables, so that the problem is reduced to a smaller problem only with inequality constraints and control variables. Therefore, it possesses advantages of both the simultaneous and the sequential approach. Furthermore, the elimination of the equality constraints substantially simplifies the line search problem and thus larger steps can be taken by successive quadratic programming (SQP) toward the optimum. We call this dynamic optimization method a quasi-sequential approach. We compare this new approach with the simultaneous approach in terms of computational cost and by analyzing the solution path. A highly nonlinear reactor control and the optimal operation of a heat-integrated column system are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. As a result, it can be concluded that this quasi-sequential approach is well suited for solving highly nonlinear large-scale optimal control problems. (c) 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 268
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization methods for large-scale production scheduling problems
    Braune, Roland
    Wagner, Stefan
    Affenzeller, Michael
    COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEMS THEORY- EUROCAST 2007, 2007, 4739 : 812 - 819
  • [42] Decomposition for Large-scale Optimization Problems with Overlapping Components
    Sun, Yuan
    Li, Xiaodong
    Ernst, Andreas
    Omidvar, Mohammad Nabi
    2019 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2019, : 326 - 333
  • [43] GRADIENT PROJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE-SCALE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS
    MORE, JJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-3, 1989, : 378 - 381
  • [44] Solving large-scale fuzzy and possibilistic optimization problems
    Lodwick, WA
    Jamison, KD
    Bachman, KA
    NAFIPS 2004: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY, VOLS 1AND 2: FUZZY SETS IN THE HEART OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES, 2004, : 146 - 150
  • [45] Solving large-scale fuzzy and possibilistic optimization problems
    Lodwick W.A.
    Bachman K.A.
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2005, 4 (4) : 257 - 278
  • [46] Solving very large-scale structural optimization problems
    Hüttner, F.
    Grosspietsch, M.
    1600, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191-4344, United States (45):
  • [47] OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR LARGE-SCALE MULTIECHELON STOCKAGE PROBLEMS
    LEBLANC, LJ
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1987, 34 (02) : 239 - 249
  • [48] Designing benchmark problems for large-scale continuous optimization
    Omidvar, Mohammad Nabi
    Li, Xiaodong
    Tang, Ke
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 316 : 419 - 436
  • [49] Solving very large-scale structural optimization problems
    Huettner, F.
    Grosspietsch, M.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (11) : 2729 - 2736
  • [50] A STOCHASTIC QUASI-NEWTON METHOD FOR LARGE-SCALE OPTIMIZATION
    Byrd, R. H.
    Hansen, S. L.
    Nocedal, Jorge
    Singer, Y.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 26 (02) : 1008 - 1031