Lessons from NSW RFS trialo of the Australian Fire Danger Rating System

被引:0
|
作者
McCoy, Laurence [1 ]
Field, David [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Rural Fire Serv, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The Fire Danger Rating System is the cornerstone of community warnings, messaging and preparedness, fire agency operational readiness and decision-making. It reflects the legislative controls over activities that could potentially cause the ignition of fires. The system underpins decision-making by private enterprise and other 'non-combat' government agencies and departments. It is critical that fire danger ratings are readily understood, appropriate and accurate. The science that underpins the system hasn't changed in more than 50 years. A new Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS) provides the framework to significantly improve the way fire danger is calculated and communicated in Australia. During the bushfire season of 2021-22, the NSW Rural Fire Service trialled the AFDRS alongside the existing McArthur-based Fire Danger Rating System. Due to decreased fire activity during the 2021-22 fire season, live trials were supplemented with retrospective analysis. Several insights were gained as well as lessons learnt about how fire danger should be calculated and determined. The NSW Southern Operational Trial highlighted the quality of work and progress made so far in building the AFDRS. Although ongoing adjustments to the systems and the Fire Behaviour Index may be required, the trial found the AFDRS is fit-for-purpose and shows clear advantages over the previous system. This paper outlines operational testing undertaken in NSW.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 58
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lessons for the Australian healthcare system from the Berwick report
    Russell, Lesley
    Dawda, Paresh
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2014, 38 (01) : 106 - 108
  • [42] Forest fire danger rating in complex topography - results from a case study in the Bavarian Alps in autumn 2011
    Schunk, C.
    Wastl, C.
    Leuchner, M.
    Schuster, C.
    Menzel, A.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (09) : 2157 - 2167
  • [43] Using the Oklahoma Mesonet in developing a near-real-time, next-generation fire danger rating system
    Carlson, JD
    Burgan, RE
    Engle, DM
    22ND CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL & FOREST METEOROLOGY WITH SYMPOSIUM ON FIRE & FOREST METEOROLOGY/12TH CONFERENCE ON BIOMETEOROLOGY & AEROBIOLOGY, 1996, : 249 - 252
  • [44] Preliminary study on the validation of ECMWF with the ground-based data for the Indonesia Fire Danger Rating System (Ina-FDRS)
    Sulistyowati, Reni
    Meliani, Fanny
    Frederik, Marina C. G.
    Amaliyah, Rizki
    Permata, Zilda Dona Okta
    Purwandani, Andri
    Sumargana, Lena
    Sadmono, Heri
    2021 IEEE ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON GEOSCIENCE, ELECTRONICS AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY (AGERS-2021), 2021, : 109 - 114
  • [45] A case-study of wildland fire management knowledge exchange: the barriers and facilitators in the development and integration of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in Ontario, Canada
    McFayden, Colin B.
    George, Colleen
    Johnston, Lynn M.
    Wotton, Mike
    Johnston, Daniel
    Sloane, Meghan
    Johnston, Joshua M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2022, 31 (09) : 835 - 846
  • [46] Modernizing the US National Fire Danger Rating System (version 4): Simplified fuel models and improved live and dead fuel moisture calculations
    Jolly, W. Matt
    Freeborn, Patrick H.
    Bradshaw, Larry S.
    Wallace, Jon
    Brittain, Stuart
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2024, 181
  • [47] Estimating Spatially Varying Severity Thresholds of a Forest Fire Danger Rating System Using Max-Stable Extreme-Event Modeling
    Stephenson, Alec G.
    Shaby, Benjamin A.
    Reich, Brian J.
    Sullivan, Andrew L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2015, 54 (02) : 395 - 407
  • [48] Faunal responses to fire in Australian tropical savannas: Insights from field experiments and their lessons for conservation management
    Andersen, Alan N.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2021, 27 (05) : 828 - 843
  • [49] Lessons Learned from Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Research and Implications for Operational Fire Prediction and Meteorological Products Provided by the Bureau of Meteorology to Australian Fire Agencies
    Peace, Mika
    Charney, Joseph
    Bally, John
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (12) : 1 - 16
  • [50] Application of the Nelson model to four timelag fuel classes using Oklahoma field observations: model evaluation and comparison with National Fire Danger Rating System algorithms
    Carlson, J. D.
    Bradshaw, Larry S.
    Nelson, Ralph M., Jr.
    Bensch, Randall R.
    Jabrzemski, Rafal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2007, 16 (02) : 204 - 216