Facilitator versus preceptor: Which offers the best support to undergraduate nursing students?

被引:57
|
作者
Walker, Sandra [1 ]
Dwyer, Trudy [1 ]
Moxham, Lorna [2 ]
Broadbent, Marc [3 ]
Sander, Teresa [4 ]
机构
[1] CQUniv Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Sci Engn & Hlth, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia
[2] CQUniv Australia, Res Off, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia
[3] CQUniv Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Sci Engn & Hlth, Noosaville, DC 4566, Australia
[4] CQUniv Emerald, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Sci Engn & Hlth, Emerald, Qld 4720, Australia
关键词
Facilitator; Preceptor; Support; Student nurses; Clinical; GROUP SUPERVISION; PERCEPTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: There is an abundance of literature regarding factors that influence student learning within the clinical environment. Within this discourse, there is a paucity of research on the impact of supervision models on the learning support needs of students. This paper presents the results of research that focused on nursing students' perceptions about the effectiveness of the support they received during their work integrated learning (WIL) experience. Background: The majority of students placed within health care facilities are in groups. The group model incorporates a facilitator who supervises the students who are placed across a number of wards. At the ward level students are then assigned a Registered Nurse (RN) who is their mentor. This occurs on a shift by shift basis. Another model of clinical supervision involves preceptorship. This approach is via a one-on-one supervision of students. Within the preceptorship model, students are supervised by a RN who is responsible for supporting them during their WIL experience and for completing their assessment. Methods: This study compared two models of clinical supervision to better understand the learning support needs as perceived by undergraduate nursing students during their WIL experience. Survey method using a self reporting online questionnaire developed by the researchers was used to collect data. Results: 159 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a Bachelor level programme of study completed the on-line survey. When comparing the two models of supervision, students supervised within the facilitator model were statistically more likely to be challenged to reflect, think, build on existing skills and knowledge and to problem-solve issues. Notably, all factors integral to RN education. Overall, students considered the quality of support to be the most important facet of supervision. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that the facilitator model is the better approach for the development of critical thinking, but both models enable the development of a student's professional identity and the development of their role within nursing. This highlights the significance of clinical experiences during undergraduate nursing education. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 535
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of hot and cold debriefing on basic life support competence and reflection in undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study
    Alanezi, Fahad Zeed
    Morrison, Caroline F.
    Wagner, Robin
    Kelcey, Benjamin
    Miller, Elaine
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2025, 83
  • [32] Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial
    Chabrera, Carolina
    Curell, Laura
    Rodriguez-Higueras, Encarnacion
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2025, 82
  • [33] Supporting culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) undergraduate nursing students undertaking clinical placements in Australia: An exploratory qualitative study of clinical facilitator and CALD student perceptions
    Lin, Frances F.
    Del Fabbro, Letitia
    Needham, Judith
    Sidwell, Danny
    Shaw, Julie
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 97
  • [34] Retention of basic life support knowledge, self-efficacy and chest compression performance in Thai undergraduate nursing students
    Partiprajak, Suphamas
    Thongpo, Pichaya
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (01) : 235 - 241
  • [35] A Labor Support Workshop to Improve Undergraduate Nursing Students' Understanding of the Importance of High Touch in a High-Tech World
    Burgess, Adriane
    Morin, Luukia
    Shiffer, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2019, 28 (03): : 142 - 150
  • [36] Undergraduate versus graduate nursing students: Differences in nutrition, physical activity, and self-reported body mass index
    Graves, Rebecca J.
    Williams, Susan G.
    Hauff, Caitlyn
    Fruh, Sharon M.
    Sims, Brook
    Hudson, Geoffrey M.
    McDermott, Ryon C.
    Sittig, Scott
    Shaw, Thomas
    Campbell, Matt
    Barinas, Jennifer L.
    Hall, Heather R.
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2022, 70 (07) : 1941 - 1946
  • [37] Pure PBL, Hybrid PBL and Lecturing: which one is more effective in developing cognitive skills of undergraduate students in pediatric nursing course?
    Mohsen Salari
    Amrollah Roozbehi
    Abdolvahed Zarifi
    Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi
    BMC Medical Education, 18
  • [38] Pure PBL, Hybrid PBL and Lecturing: which one is more effective in developing cognitive skills of undergraduate students in pediatric nursing course?
    Salari, Mohsen
    Roozbehi, Amrollah
    Zarifi, Abdolvahed
    Tarmizi, Rohani Ahmad
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [39] Language support improves oral communication skills of undergraduate nursing students: A 6-month follow-up survey
    Salamonson, Yenna
    Glew, Paul
    Everett, Bronwyn
    Woodmass, Joel M.
    Lynch, Joan
    Ramjan, Lucie M.
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2019, 72 : 54 - 60
  • [40] Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training in Interprofessional Teams of Undergraduate Nursing and Medical Students Using Mannequin-Based Simulation
    Webster C.S.
    Hallett C.
    Torrie J.
    Verstappen A.
    Barrow M.
    Moharib M.M.
    Weller J.M.
    Medical Science Educator, 2018, 28 (1) : 155 - 163