Can Material and Energy Be Saved by Differentiating Water Quality Targets in the Water Purification Process?

被引:3
|
作者
Dente, Sebastien M. R. [1 ]
Shimizu, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Wang, Tao [2 ]
Hashimoto, Seiji [1 ]
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
[2] Tongji Univ, Circular Econ Res Inst, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
water supply; water quality; energy consumption; material consumption; product service system; PSS; PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EFFICIENCY; DESIGN; TOOL;
D O I
10.3390/su12208730
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The current organization of water supply systems demands drinking standards for all the households' usage of water. Few dual water systems, i.e., systems in which the quality of the water supplied is differentiated by types of use, exist but are mainly circumscribed to developing countries. Besides, bath and showers are so far considered as a potable use of water despite only drinking and cooking activities requiring the high-quality standards of potable water. The present work demonstrates how the principles of dual water systems can be incorporated into the sustainable concept of product-service system (PSS) using a dual water system of a municipal water supply treatment plant in France as a case study. The PSS is based on the water quality, and the bathing activity of households is considered with a dedicated standard for the first time. Two systems are considered, S1 and S2, supplied with the same raw water quality and treated with drinking (S1) bathing standards (S2). The quality parameters considered are total organic carbon (TOC) and turbidity (T) and the potential savings related to costs, material, and energy consumptions are assessed using EVALEAU as a process modeling tool. The treatment lines consisted of powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition, coagulation, flocculation, settling, and rapid sand filtration. Results show that material consumption can be reduced by 41% mainly through the decrease in chemical consumption associated with the change of requirement for the TOC parameter. On the opposite, energy consumption was found dependent on the water of volume treated rather than its quality leading to only marginal savings. The cost was decreased by 37% as a result of the reduction of the chemicals consumed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Application of Nanofiber Nonwovens to Water Purification Process
    Mukai, Yasuhito
    SEN-I GAKKAISHI, 2023, 79 (06) : P182 - P187
  • [33] Biological activated carbon process for water purification
    Dussert, Bertrand W.
    Van Stone, Gary R.
    Water Engineering and Management, 1994, 141 (12): : 22 - 24
  • [34] Membrane Separation Process in Wastewater and Water Purification
    Giacobbo, Alexandre
    Bernardes, Andrea Moura
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [35] Evolution of regulatory targets for drinking water quality
    Sinclair, Martha
    O'Toole, Joanne
    Gibney, Katherine
    Leder, Karin
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2015, 13 (02) : 413 - 426
  • [36] COP prediction for the integration of a water purification process in a heat transformer:: with and without energy recycling
    Hernandez, J. A.
    Juarez-Romero, D.
    Morales, L. I.
    Siqueiros, J.
    DESALINATION, 2008, 219 (1-3) : 66 - 80
  • [37] Hydrogels as an Emerging Material Platform for Solar Water Purification
    Zhou, Xingyi
    Guo, Youhong
    Zhao, Fei
    Yu, Guihua
    ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 52 (11) : 3244 - 3253
  • [38] The Croton Water Supply: Its Quality and Purification
    Fuller, George W.
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 106 (04): : 12 - 12
  • [39] Application of porous concrete to purification of water quality
    Shinnishi, N
    Nakazawa, T
    Imai, F
    Zhang, RH
    Kanemaru, K
    2001 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING MATERIALS, VOL II, 2001, : 353 - 360
  • [40] Zeolites as versatile material for sustainable water purification: a review
    Manoharmayum, Vishwanath Sharma
    Ningombam, Doshita
    EQA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2025, 65 : 25 - 34