共 50 条
Emerging issues in population viability analysis
被引:289
|作者:
Reed, JM
[1
]
Mills, LS
Dunning, JB
Menges, ES
McKelvey, KS
Frye, R
Beissinger, SR
Anstett, MC
Miller, P
机构:
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Biol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Sch Forestry, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Archbold Biol Stn, Lake Placid, FL 33862 USA
[5] Forestry Sci Lab, Missoula, MT 59807 USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[7] Univ Calif Berkeley, Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[8] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, F-34293 Montpellier 05, France
[9] Conservat Breeding Specialist Grp, Apple Valley, MN 55124 USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99419.x
中图分类号:
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号:
090705 ;
摘要:
Population viability analysis (PVA) has become a commonly used tool in endangered species management. There is no single process that constitutes PVA, but all approaches have in common all assessment of a population's risk of extinction (or quasi extinction) or its projected population growth either under current conditions or expected from proposed management. As model sophistication increases, and software programs that facilitate PVA without the need for modeling expertise become more available, there is greater potential for the misuse of models and increased confusion over interpreting their results. Consequently, we discuss the practical use and limitations of PVA in conservation planning, and we discuss some emerging issues of PVA. We review extant issues that have become prominent in PTA, including spatially explicit modeling, sensitivity analysis, incorporating genetics into PVA, PVA in plants, and PVA software packages, but our coverage of emerging issues is not comprehensive. We conclude that PVA is a powerful tool in conservation biology for comparing alternative research plans and relative extinction risks among species, but the suggest caution in its use: (1) because PVA is a model, its validity depends on the appropriateness of the model's structure and data quality; (2) results should be presented with appropriate assessment of confidence; (3) model construction and results should be subject to external review, and (4) model structure, input, and results should be treated as hypotheses to be tested. We also suggest (5) restricting the definition of PVA to development of a formal quantitative model, (6) focusing more research on determining how pervasive density-dependence feedback is across species, and (7) not using PVA to determine minimum population size or (8) the specific probability of reaching extinction. The most appropriate use of PVA may be for comparing the relative effects of potential management actions on population growth or persistence.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 19
页数:13
相关论文