共 50 条
Pilot Testing of a Brief Couple-Based Mind-Body Intervention for Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Partners
被引:18
|作者:
Milbury, Kathrin
[1
]
Engle, Rosalinda
[1
]
Tsao, Anne
[1
,2
]
Liao, Zhongxing
[3
]
Owens, April
Chaoul, Alejandro
[1
]
Bruera, Eduardo
[1
]
Cohen, Lorenzo
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Palliat Rehabilitat & Integrat Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词:
Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer;
couples;
mind-body intervention;
quality of life;
spiritual well-being;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
ASSISTED EMOTIONAL DISCLOSURE;
PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS;
FAMILY CAREGIVERS;
GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER;
POSITIVE EMOTIONS;
CIRCUMPLEX MODEL;
CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
PHYSICAL HEALTH;
SPIRITUAL PAIN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.027
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Context. Given the generally incurable nature of metastatic lung cancer, patients and their spouses/partners are at risk for psychological and spiritual distress. To address this concern, we developed a couple-based mind-body (CBMB) intervention. Objectives. This formative research aimed at examining the intervention's acceptability and initial efficacy in patients with metastatic lung cancer undergoing treatment and their spouses. Methods. Intervention content evaluation sessions and an ensuing single-arm trial were conducted. To evaluate intervention content, participants performed intervention exercises and then participated in semistructured interviews and completed written evaluations. In the single-arm trial, four intervention sessions were delivered over two weeks, focusing on cultivating mindfulness, interpersonal connection, gratitude, and purpose. Newly recruited couples completed measures of depressive symptoms, cancer distress, spiritual well-being, and sleep disturbances before and after the intervention. Results. Content evaluations by seven dyads of patients and their partners revealed high acceptability ratings for the CBMB intervention (e.g., all participants would recommend the intervention). Consent and adherence rates (54% and 67%, respectively) were acceptable in the single-arm trial. All patients (n = 7 dyads; 67% male; mean age, 55 years) and partners (33% male; mean age, 59 years) rated the intervention as useful. Paired t-test analyses revealed large effect sizes for reduced sleep disturbances (d = 1.83) and medium effect sizes for cancer-specific distress (d = 0.61) for patients and large effect sizes for depressive symptoms (d = 0.90) for partners. Conclusion. Based on these results, the CBMB intervention appears to be acceptable and subjectively useful. In addition, we observed preliminary evidence of quality of life gains in both patients and their partners. (C) 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 961
页数:9
相关论文