Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings

被引:76
|
作者
Borgers, Arian [1 ]
Dervvall, Jeroen [1 ,5 ]
Koedijk, Kees [2 ,3 ,4 ]
ter Horst, Jenke [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, European Ctr Corp Engagement, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Sch Econ & Management, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tias Sch Business & Soc, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London EC1V 3PZ, England
[5] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Management Sci & Technol, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Mutual funds; Social norms; Sin stocks; Controversial stocks; Socially responsible investing; CORPORATE-DECISION; RELIGIOUS BELIEFS; FINANCIAL MARKET; RETURNS; GOVERNANCE; STYLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We study the economic significance of social dimensions in investment decisions by analyzing the holdings of U.S. equity mutual funds over the period 2004-2012. Using these holdings, we measure funds' exposures to socially sensitive stocks in order to answer two questions. What explains cross-sectional variation in mutual funds' exposure to controversial companies? Does exposure to controversial stocks drive fund returns? We find that exposures to socially sensitive stocks are weaker for funds that aim to attract socially conscious and institutional investor clientele, and they relate to local political and religious factors. The financial payoff associated with greater "sin" stock exposure is positive and statistically significant, but becomes non-significant with broader definitions of socially sensitive investments. Despite the positive relation between mutual fund return and sin stock exposure, the annualized risk-adjusted return spread between a portfolio of funds with highest sin stock exposure and its lowest-ranked counterpart is statistically not significant. The results suggest that fund managers do not tilt heavily towards controversial stocks because of social considerations and practical constraints. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 126
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does cross-border investment improve mutual fund performance? Evidence from China
    Han, Han
    Wang, Zhibin
    Zhao, Xueqing
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 86
  • [22] The impact of financial and economic factors on Islamic mutual fund performance: Evidence from multiple fund categories
    Uddin, Gazi Salah
    Hernandez, Jose Arreola
    Labidi, Chiraz
    Troster, Victor
    Yoon, Seong-Min
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 52-53
  • [23] Investors Do Respond to Poor Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence from Inflows and Outflows
    Cashman, George
    Deli, Daniel
    Nardari, Federico
    Villupuram, Sriram
    FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2012, 47 (04) : 719 - 739
  • [24] INVESTMENT STYLE VOLATILITY AND MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE
    Brown, Keith C.
    Harlow, W., V
    Zhang, Hanjiang
    JOURNAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 19 (01): : 25 - 61
  • [25] MARKET TIMING AND MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
    CHANG, EC
    LEWELLEN, WG
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1984, 57 (01): : 57 - 72
  • [26] Do mutual funds time the market? Evidence from portfolio holdings
    Jiang, George J.
    Yao, Tong
    Yu, Tong
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 86 (03) : 724 - 758
  • [27] Do fund managers time momentum? Evidence from mutual fund and hedge fund returns
    Wang, Feifei
    Zheng, Lingling
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (01) : 55 - 91
  • [28] MOMENTUM INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE, AND HERDING - A STUDY OF MUTUAL FUND BEHAVIOR
    GRINBLATT, M
    TITMAN, S
    WERMERS, R
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1994, 49 (03): : 1069 - 1070
  • [29] Mutual fund herding and performance: Evidence from China
    Fan, Yaoyao
    Song, Qinhao
    Guan, Rong
    Ly, Kim Cuong
    Jiang, Yuxiang
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 95
  • [30] Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: A study of mutual fund behavior
    Grinblatt, M
    Titman, S
    Wermers, R
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 85 (05): : 1088 - 1105