Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings

被引:76
|
作者
Borgers, Arian [1 ]
Dervvall, Jeroen [1 ,5 ]
Koedijk, Kees [2 ,3 ,4 ]
ter Horst, Jenke [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, European Ctr Corp Engagement, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Sch Econ & Management, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tias Sch Business & Soc, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London EC1V 3PZ, England
[5] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Management Sci & Technol, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Mutual funds; Social norms; Sin stocks; Controversial stocks; Socially responsible investing; CORPORATE-DECISION; RELIGIOUS BELIEFS; FINANCIAL MARKET; RETURNS; GOVERNANCE; STYLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We study the economic significance of social dimensions in investment decisions by analyzing the holdings of U.S. equity mutual funds over the period 2004-2012. Using these holdings, we measure funds' exposures to socially sensitive stocks in order to answer two questions. What explains cross-sectional variation in mutual funds' exposure to controversial companies? Does exposure to controversial stocks drive fund returns? We find that exposures to socially sensitive stocks are weaker for funds that aim to attract socially conscious and institutional investor clientele, and they relate to local political and religious factors. The financial payoff associated with greater "sin" stock exposure is positive and statistically significant, but becomes non-significant with broader definitions of socially sensitive investments. Despite the positive relation between mutual fund return and sin stock exposure, the annualized risk-adjusted return spread between a portfolio of funds with highest sin stock exposure and its lowest-ranked counterpart is statistically not significant. The results suggest that fund managers do not tilt heavily towards controversial stocks because of social considerations and practical constraints. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 126
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reciprocal social influence on investment decisions: Behavioral evidence from a group of mutual fund managers
    König F.
    Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 2014, 28 (3) : 233 - 262
  • [2] Cash Holdings and Mutual Fund Performance*
    Simutin, Mikhail
    REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2014, 18 (04) : 1425 - 1464
  • [3] Mutual fund investment and corporate social responsibility: evidence from Korea
    Lee, Kyung Yun
    Mo, Kyoungwon
    Yang, Eunju
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (08) : 1082 - 1089
  • [4] The Corporate Investment Benefits of Mutual Fund Dual Holdings
    Renjie, Rex Wang
    Verwijmeren, Patrick
    Xia, Shuo
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2023,
  • [5] The impact of ESG investment on fund performance: Evidence from mutual fund style drift
    Lin, Jiayu
    Pan, Dongliang
    Sha, Yezhou
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 91
  • [6] On the concentration of mutual fund portfolio holdings: Evidence from Taiwan
    Chen, XiaoHua
    Lai, Yun-Ju
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2015, 33 : 268 - 286
  • [7] Investment Decisions Under Ambiguity: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investor Behavior
    Li, C. Wei
    Tiwari, Ashish
    Tong, Lin
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (08) : 2509 - 2528
  • [8] Mutual fund investment performance
    Droms, WG
    Walker, DA
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 1996, 36 (03): : 347 - 363
  • [9] International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style
    Bauer, R
    Koedijk, K
    Otten, R
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (07) : 1751 - 1767
  • [10] Gains from Markowitz Optimization: Evidence from Reoptimization of Mutual Fund Holdings
    Elavia, Tony
    Kothari, S. P.
    Li, Xu
    You, Haifeng
    JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2022, 48 (03): : 199 - 218