Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery-A systemic review

被引:47
|
作者
Tseng, Ling-Hong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ilene [3 ]
Chang, Shuenn-Dyh [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Chyi-Long [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lin Kou Branch, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[2] Univ Chang Gung, Sch Med, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[3] Genom Prote & Bioinformat Pty Ltd, Ctr Bioinformat & Syst Biol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; pelvic reconstruction surgery; sacrospinous ligament fixation; systemic review; SUPPORT DEFECTS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; VAULT PROLAPSE; SUSPENSION; COLPOPEXY; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2012.11.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Women with POP often experience pelvic discomfort, urinary and fecal problems, sexual dysfunction, and an overall decrease in their quality of life. Surgical treatment is a feasible option if conservative management fails. Various surgical techniques have been proposed to correct POP with or without the use of graft material. Owing to recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration warnings about mesh-related complications, sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF), as a traditional vaginal procedure, may play an important role again. To answer this question and evaluate quantitatively the efficacy of SSF in POP, we conducted a systemic review of the available data about SSF and POP. Interventions had to include SSF as a point of attachment. To eliminate confounding bias and effect modification, at least one arm must include SSF without mesh or graft. All follow-up periods were allowed. Information on the following parameters was extracted and entered into a database: study design, type of intervention, number of patients, follow-up in months, cure rate, recurrence rate, intra/postoperative complications, and/or uni/bilateral, preventive/therapeutic, or concomitant procedures. Published papers from the years 1995 to 2011 were selected for analysis. Copyright (C) 2013, Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FIVE-YEAR OUTCOMES OF UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION OR SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOR APICAL PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Jelovsek, J. E.
    Brubaker, L.
    Gantz, M.
    Pugh, N.
    Weidner, A. C.
    Richter, H. E.
    Menefee, S.
    Norton, P.
    Schaffer, J.
    Meikle, S.
    Barber, M. D.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S1 - S2
  • [22] A novel, meshless method of vaginal colpopexy by sacrospinous ligament fixation in the context of comprehensive repair of pelvic organ prolapse
    Lucente, V. R.
    Baessler, K.
    Polland, A.
    Shobeiri, S. A.
    Bertrand, J. D.
    Garely, A.
    Tuscher, M.
    Peschers, U. M.
    Davila, G. W.
    Laron, E.
    Molden, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S746 - S747
  • [23] A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse
    Zhu, Hongxia
    Sun, Yixuan
    Zheng, Xuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (05): : 5672 - 5678
  • [24] Surgical Outcomes and Feasibility of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation through Anterior Approach for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Agrawal, Mohini
    Kumari, Rajesh
    Sharma, J. B.
    Nisha, N.
    Manasi, Deoghare
    Bhatla, Neerja
    JOURNAL OF MID-LIFE HEALTH, 2023, 14 (04) : 280 - 284
  • [25] General Versus Regional Anesthesia in Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Assessment of a National Database.
    Romanova, A.
    Gaigbe-Togbe, B.
    Lieberman, D.
    Sifri, Y.
    Woodbury, C.
    Tran, A.
    Hardart, A.
    Dabney, L.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S376 - S376
  • [26] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 269 - 270
  • [27] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Angermeier, Kenneth W.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 263 - 263
  • [28] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Clark, Joseph Y.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 256 - 256
  • [29] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ross, Lawrence S.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 158 - 158
  • [30] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Russo, Paul
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 176 - 176