Energy, environmental and economic effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in a Developing Country

被引:51
|
作者
Farooq, Muhammad Khalid [1 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Shrestha, Ram M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Environm Resources & Dev, Energy Field Study, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
关键词
Renewable Portfolio Standard; MARKAL model; Power sector in Pakistan; TRANSPORT SECTOR; GENERATION; EMISSIONS; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.098
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the potential of renewable energy for power generation and its energy, environmental and economic implications in Pakistan, using a bottom up type of long term energy system based on the MARKAL framework. The results show that under a highly optimistic renewable portfolio standard (RPS) of 80%, fossil fuel consumption in 2050 would be reduced from 4660 Pi to 306 PJ, and the GHG emissions would decrease from 489 million tons to 27 million tons. Nevertheless, price of the electricity generation will increase significantly from US$ 47/MWh under current circumstances (in the base case) to US$ 86/MWh under RPS80. However the effects on import dependency, energy-mix diversity, per unit price of electricity generation and cost of imported fuels indicate that, it may not be desirable to go beyond RPS50. Under RPS50 in 2050, fuel consumption of the power sector would reduce from 21% under the base case to 9% of total fossil fuels supplied to the country. It will decrease not only GHG emission to 170 million tons but also will reduce import dependency from 73% under the base case to 21% and improve energy diversity mix with small increase in price of electricity generation (from US$ 47/MWh under the base case to US$ 59/MWh under RPS 50). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 1001
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electric utility plans are consistent with Renewable Portfolio Standards and Clean Energy Standards in most US states
    Grace D. Kroeger
    Matthew G. Burgess
    Climatic Change, 2024, 177
  • [42] Electric utility plans are consistent with Renewable Portfolio Standards and Clean Energy Standards in most US states
    Kroeger, Grace D.
    Burgess, Matthew G.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2024, 177 (01)
  • [43] Effects of economic complexity and metallic mineral resources on renewable energy transition in developing countries
    Viglioni, Marco Túlio Dinali
    Calegario, Cristina Lelis Leal
    Bruhn, Nádia Campos Pereira
    Resources Policy, 2025, 102
  • [44] Imports in the EU's renewable energy policy: environmental non-tariff barriers and developing country biodiesel
    Williams, Alphanso
    Kerr, William A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 15 (02) : 129 - 145
  • [45] The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Raghutla, Chandrashekar
    Chittedi, Krishna Reddy
    Jiao, Zhilun
    Xuan Vinh Vo
    ENERGY, 2020, 207
  • [46] Market and welfare effects of renewable portfolio standards in United States electricity markets
    Bhattacharya, Suparna
    Giannakas, Konstantinos
    Schoengold, Karina
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 384 - 401
  • [47] Environmental component in economic efficiency of renewable energy projects
    Rukavishnikova, I
    Rumyantseva, A.
    Plastinina, I
    ENERGY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY II: THE QUEST FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 205 : 203 - 212
  • [48] How dynamic renewable portfolio standards impact the diffusion of renewable energy in China? A networked evolutionary game analysis
    Fang, Yujuan
    Wei, Wei
    Mei, Shengwei
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 193 : 778 - 788
  • [49] How do carbon cap-and-trade mechanisms and renewable portfolio standards affect renewable energy investment?
    Yan, Yue
    Sun, Mei
    Guo, Zhilong
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 165
  • [50] How do developing country constraints affect renewable energy entrepreneurs?
    Gabriel, Cle-Anne
    Kirkwood, Jodyanne
    Walton, Sara
    Rose, Elizabeth L.
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 35 : 52 - 66