Energy, environmental and economic effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in a Developing Country

被引:51
|
作者
Farooq, Muhammad Khalid [1 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Shrestha, Ram M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Environm Resources & Dev, Energy Field Study, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
关键词
Renewable Portfolio Standard; MARKAL model; Power sector in Pakistan; TRANSPORT SECTOR; GENERATION; EMISSIONS; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.098
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the potential of renewable energy for power generation and its energy, environmental and economic implications in Pakistan, using a bottom up type of long term energy system based on the MARKAL framework. The results show that under a highly optimistic renewable portfolio standard (RPS) of 80%, fossil fuel consumption in 2050 would be reduced from 4660 Pi to 306 PJ, and the GHG emissions would decrease from 489 million tons to 27 million tons. Nevertheless, price of the electricity generation will increase significantly from US$ 47/MWh under current circumstances (in the base case) to US$ 86/MWh under RPS80. However the effects on import dependency, energy-mix diversity, per unit price of electricity generation and cost of imported fuels indicate that, it may not be desirable to go beyond RPS50. Under RPS50 in 2050, fuel consumption of the power sector would reduce from 21% under the base case to 9% of total fossil fuels supplied to the country. It will decrease not only GHG emission to 170 million tons but also will reduce import dependency from 73% under the base case to 21% and improve energy diversity mix with small increase in price of electricity generation (from US$ 47/MWh under the base case to US$ 59/MWh under RPS 50). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 1001
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Waste-to-energy, State Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), and the Future of Renewable Energy
    Brandes, William F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE TO ENERGY CONFERENCE, NAWTEC20 2012, 2012, : 139 - 146
  • [2] Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea
    Moon, Ji-Hong
    Lee, Jeung-Woo
    Lee, Uen-Do
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (20) : 9550 - 9557
  • [3] Economic and environmental assessment of renewable energy micro-systems in a developing country
    Amaral, Luis P.
    Araujo, Antonio
    Mendes, Edmilson
    Martins, Nelson
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 7 (07) : 101 - 110
  • [4] The effects of renewables portfolio standards on renewable energy generation
    Pastor, Daniel J.
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2020, 40 (03): : 2121 - +
  • [5] The environmental and cost implications of solar energy preferences in Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Novacheck, Joshua
    Johnson, Jeremiah X.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 : 250 - 261
  • [6] Assessing the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Alternative Renewable Portfolio Standards: Winners and Losers
    Mamkhezri, Jamal
    Malczynski, Leonard A.
    Chermak, Janie M.
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (11)
  • [7] Funding renewable energy: An analysis of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 : 205 - 216
  • [8] Renewable energy potential and adoption of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 36 : 67 - 70
  • [9] Synergistic effects of carbon cap-and-trade and renewable portfolio standards on renewable energy diffusion
    Yue, Xiongping
    Wang, Chao
    Sun, Boxue
    Ren, Huanyu
    Tan, Yong
    Huang, Liling
    Feng, Dan
    Li, Xin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 423
  • [10] Optimal Energy Mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea
    Geem, Zong Woo
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05):