Refractured Well Selection for Multicriteria Group Decision Making by Integrating Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS Based on Interval-Typed Fuzzy Numbers

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Tiejun [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Jianhua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Chunquan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SW Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[2] SW Petr Univ, Coll Sci, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Coll Math & Econometr, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; RISK ANALYSIS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; OIL;
D O I
10.1155/2012/304287
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) research has rapidly been developed and become a hot topic for solving complex decision problems. Because of incomplete or non-obtainable information, the refractured well-selection problem often exists in complex and vague conditions that the relative importance of the criteria and the impacts of the alternatives on these criteria are difficult to determine precisely. This paper presents a new model for MCGDM by integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with fuzzy TOPSIS based on interval-typed fuzzy numbers, to help group decision makers for well-selection during refracturing treatment. The fuzzy AHP is used to analyze the structure of the selection problem and to determine weights of the criteria with triangular fuzzy numbers, and fuzzy TOPSIS with interval-typed triangular fuzzy numbers is proposed to determine final ranking for all the alternatives. Furthermore, the algorithm allows finding the best alternatives. The feasibility of the proposed methodology is also demonstrated by the application of refractured well-selection problem and the method will provide a more effective decision-making tool for MCGDM problems.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] decideXpert: Collaborative system using AHP-TOPSIS and fuzzy techniques for multicriteria group decision-making
    Saoud, Abdelghani
    Lachgar, Mohamed
    Hanine, Mohamed
    El Dhimni, Roa
    El Azizi, Kawtar
    Machmoum, Hajar
    SOFTWAREX, 2025, 29
  • [12] MODELS FOR FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING BASED ON FUZZY RELATIONS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2009, 62 (05): : 551 - 558
  • [14] Selection of Personnel Based on Multicriteria Decision Making and Fuzzy Logic
    Santiago, Zapata C.
    Luis, Escobar R.
    Ricardo, Lopez N.
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER VISION, VOL 2, 2020, 944 : 1 - 10
  • [15] A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making
    Chang, Yu-Hern
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Chang, Yu-Wei
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (04) : 2179 - 2187
  • [16] A fuzzy decision making methodology based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with a case study for information systems outsourcing decisions
    Nazari-Shirkouhi, Salman
    Miri-Nargesi, Sina
    Ansarinejad, Ayyub
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (06) : 3921 - 3943
  • [17] Single and Interval-Valued Hybrid Enthalpy Fuzzy Sets and a TOPSIS Approach for Multicriteria Group Decision Making
    Olgun, Murat
    Turkarslan, Ezgi
    Ye, Jun
    Unver, Mehmet
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [18] Decision making under uncertainty using PEES–fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for landfill location selection
    Hanine M.
    Boutkhoum O.
    Maknissi A.E.
    Tikniouine A.
    Agouti T.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2016, 36 (4) : 351 - 367
  • [19] Integrating TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for effective group decision making
    Hajek, Petr
    Froelich, Wojciech
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 485 : 394 - 412
  • [20] Stock Selection into Portfolio by Fuzzy Quantitative Analysis and Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making
    Yodmun, Satit
    Witayakiattilerd, Wichai
    ADVANCES IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 2016