Weather risk management at the Olympic Winter Games

被引:33
|
作者
Rutty, M. [1 ]
Scott, D. [1 ]
Steiger, R. [2 ]
Johnson, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Geog & Environm Management, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] MCI Tourism Business Studies, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
climate; Olympic Winter Games; Olympics; adaptation; weather;
D O I
10.1080/13683500.2014.887665
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The globally celebrated Olympic Winter Games (OWG) are highly dependent on suitable snow and ice conditions to support elite-level competitions. To determine the range of weather impacts on the Games, this study examines the official Olympic post-Games reports from 1924 to 2010. Impacts include preparations for the Games, holding outdoor opening-closing ceremonies, outdoor sporting competitions, spectator comfort, transportation, and television broadcasts. The study also examines the range of historical adaptations that have developed to manage weather risks at the OWG. Three adaptation eras are identified, spanning the history of the games: emergent adaptation, technological transition, and advanced adaptation. Analysis reveals that while weather-induced impacts have always been a part of the Games, these impacts would be far greater if not for technical climatic adaptations. With the average daytime temperature of host locations steadily increasing from 0.4 degrees C at the Games held in the 1920-1950s to 7.8 degrees C at the Games held in the twenty-first century, it would be difficult to imagine recent host cities/regions successfully delivering the diverse Games programme exclusively on natural ice and snow. The connection between the evolving needs for weather risk management strategies by Olympic organisers and the growth of the Olympics in size and scope is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 946
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robots for the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympic Games
    Park, Hyunsub
    Oh, Jun-Ho
    SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2018, 3 (16)
  • [32] Telecommunications at the Nagano 1998 Winter Olympic Games
    Takizawa, Y
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2001, 39 (07) : 76 - 84
  • [33] Materials recovery during the Winter Olympic Games
    Madole, JC
    LaFleur, C
    BIOCYCLE, 2002, 43 (03) : 46 - 46
  • [34] A Research on the Risk and Crisis Management of Beijing 2008 Olympic Games
    Tang, Yunsong
    Yu, Zhiqiang
    Li, Zhenya
    Zhang, Yun
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE AND MANAGEMENT & 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GEO-INFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 90 - 95
  • [35] Olympic games as performance and public event: The case of the XVII Winter Olympic games in Norway.
    Wamsley, KB
    JOURNAL OF SPORT HISTORY, 2002, 29 (01) : 165 - 167
  • [36] Sources and risk assessment of atmospheric Hg during the 2022 Beijing Olympic Winter Games
    Wang, Chunjie
    Wang, Zhangwei
    Zhang, Xiaoshan
    Gao, Yu
    Zhang, Huan
    Liu, Xuan
    Zhang, Yi
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 302
  • [37] Marine weather support during the 1996 Olympic Games
    Rinard, SK
    Powell, M
    Garza, C
    Hoogenboom, G
    CONFERENCE ON COASTAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC PREDICTION, 1996, : 331 - 333
  • [38] Positioning at the Olympic Winter Games Examining the targeting of Olympic Winter Sports by medal-winning nations
    Weber, Andreas Christoph
    De Bosscher, Veerle
    Kempf, Hippolyt
    SPORT BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (05) : 417 - 442
  • [39] The Impact of Weather Forecasts of Various Lead Times on Snowmaking Decisions Made for the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Winter Games
    Doyle, Chris
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 171 (1-2) : 87 - 94
  • [40] ENVIRONMENT CANADA'S EXPERIMENTAL NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEMS FOR THE VANCOUVER 2010 WINTER OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC GAMES
    Mailhot, J.
    Belair, S.
    Charron, M.
    Doyle, C.
    Joe, P.
    Abrahamowicz, M.
    Bernier, N. B.
    Denis, B.
    Erfani, A.
    Frenette, R.
    Giguere, A.
    Isaac, G. A.
    McLennan, N.
    McTaggart-Cowan, R.
    Milbrandt, J.
    Tong, L.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 91 (08) : 1073 - 1085