Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women

被引:62
|
作者
Overgaard, Charlotte [1 ]
Moller, Anna Margrethe [2 ]
Fenger-Gron, Morten [3 ,4 ]
Knudsen, Lisbeth B. [1 ]
Sandall, Jane [5 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Work, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, DK-8000 Aarhus N, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Div Womens Hlth, St Thomas Hosp, London WC2R 2LS, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2011年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
BIRTH CENTER; CARE; PLACE; LABOR; EXPERIENCES; DELIVERY; MOTHERS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare perinatal and maternal morbidity and birth interventions in low-risk women giving birth in two freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) and two obstetric units (OUs). Design: A cohort study with a matched control group. Setting: The region of North Jutland, Denmark. Participants: 839 low-risk women intending FMU birth and a matched control group of 839 low-risk women intending OU birth were included at the start of care in labour. OU women were individually chosen to match selected obstetric/socio-economic characteristics of FMU women. Analysis was by intention to treat. Main outcome measures: Perinatal and maternal morbidity and interventions. Results: No significant differences in perinatal morbidity were observed between groups (Apgar scores <7/5, <9/5 or <7/1, admittance to neonatal unit, asphyxia or readmission). Adverse outcomes were rare and occurred in both groups. FMU women were significantly less likely to experience an abnormal fetal heart rate (RR: 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), fetal-pelvic complications (0.2, 0.05 to 0.6), shoulder dystocia (0.3, 0.1 to 0.9), occipital-posterior presentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.9) and postpartum haemorrhage >500 ml (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6) compared with OU women. Significant reductions were found for the FMU group's use of caesarean section (0.6, 0.3 to 0.9), instrumental delivery (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6), and oxytocin augmentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.6) and epidural analgesia (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6). Transfer during or <2 h after birth occurred in 14.8% of all FMU births but more frequently in primiparas than in multiparas (36.7% vs 7.2%). Conclusion: Comparing FMU and OU groups, there was no increase in perinatal morbidity, but there were significantly reduced incidences of maternal morbidity, birth interventions including caesarean section, and increased likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth. FMU care may be considered as an adequate alternative to OU care for low-risk women. Pregnant prospective mothers should be given an informed choice of place of birth, including information on transfer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births
    Souter, Vivienne
    Nethery, Elizabeth
    Kopas, Mary Lou
    Wurz, Hannah
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (05): : 1056 - 1065
  • [12] Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births
    Alouini, Souhail
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02): : 482 - 482
  • [13] Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands
    Bolten, N.
    De Jonge, A.
    Zwagerman, E.
    Zwagerman, P.
    Klomp, T.
    Zwart, J. J.
    Geerts, C. C.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [14] Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands
    N. Bolten
    A. de Jonge
    E. Zwagerman
    P. Zwagerman
    T. Klomp
    J. J. Zwart
    C. C. Geerts
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [15] Women’s experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study
    Rachel E Rowe
    Jennifer J Kurinczuk
    Louise Locock
    Ray Fitzpatrick
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12
  • [16] Women's experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study
    Rowe, Rachel E.
    Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
    Locock, Louise
    Fitzpatrick, Ray
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2012, 12
  • [17] Creatine and pregnancy outcomes, a prospective cohort study in low-risk pregnant women: study protocol
    De Guingand, Deborah L.
    Ellery, Stacey J.
    Davies-Tuck, Miranda L.
    Dickinson, Hayley
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [18] The first alongside midwifery unit in Spain: A retrospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Palau-Costafreda, Roser
    Gumiel, Sara Garcia
    Velasco, Amaranta Eles
    Jansana-Riera, Anna
    Orus-Covisa, Lluna
    Gonzalez, Julia Hermida
    Ramos, Miriam Algarra
    Canet-Velez, Olga
    Gutierrez, Noemi Obregon
    Escuriet, Ramon
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (04): : 1057 - 1067
  • [19] Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women
    Rosenblatt, RA
    Dobie, SA
    Hart, LG
    Schneeweiss, R
    Gould, D
    Raine, TR
    Benedetti, TJ
    Pirani, MJ
    Perrin, EB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (03) : 344 - 351
  • [20] Incidence, trends and risk factors for perineal injuries of low-risk pregnant women: Experience from a midwife run obstetric unit, South Africa
    Hoque, Akm M.
    Hoque, Muhammad E.
    Hal, Guido V.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 25 (04): : 52 - 62