Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women

被引:62
|
作者
Overgaard, Charlotte [1 ]
Moller, Anna Margrethe [2 ]
Fenger-Gron, Morten [3 ,4 ]
Knudsen, Lisbeth B. [1 ]
Sandall, Jane [5 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Work, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, DK-8000 Aarhus N, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Div Womens Hlth, St Thomas Hosp, London WC2R 2LS, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2011年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
BIRTH CENTER; CARE; PLACE; LABOR; EXPERIENCES; DELIVERY; MOTHERS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare perinatal and maternal morbidity and birth interventions in low-risk women giving birth in two freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) and two obstetric units (OUs). Design: A cohort study with a matched control group. Setting: The region of North Jutland, Denmark. Participants: 839 low-risk women intending FMU birth and a matched control group of 839 low-risk women intending OU birth were included at the start of care in labour. OU women were individually chosen to match selected obstetric/socio-economic characteristics of FMU women. Analysis was by intention to treat. Main outcome measures: Perinatal and maternal morbidity and interventions. Results: No significant differences in perinatal morbidity were observed between groups (Apgar scores <7/5, <9/5 or <7/1, admittance to neonatal unit, asphyxia or readmission). Adverse outcomes were rare and occurred in both groups. FMU women were significantly less likely to experience an abnormal fetal heart rate (RR: 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), fetal-pelvic complications (0.2, 0.05 to 0.6), shoulder dystocia (0.3, 0.1 to 0.9), occipital-posterior presentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.9) and postpartum haemorrhage >500 ml (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6) compared with OU women. Significant reductions were found for the FMU group's use of caesarean section (0.6, 0.3 to 0.9), instrumental delivery (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6), and oxytocin augmentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.6) and epidural analgesia (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6). Transfer during or <2 h after birth occurred in 14.8% of all FMU births but more frequently in primiparas than in multiparas (36.7% vs 7.2%). Conclusion: Comparing FMU and OU groups, there was no increase in perinatal morbidity, but there were significantly reduced incidences of maternal morbidity, birth interventions including caesarean section, and increased likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth. FMU care may be considered as an adequate alternative to OU care for low-risk women. Pregnant prospective mothers should be given an informed choice of place of birth, including information on transfer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women
    Bernitz, Stine
    Oian, Pal
    Sandvik, Leiv
    Blix, Ellen
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [2] Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women
    Stine Bernitz
    Pål Øian
    Leiv Sandvik
    Ellen Blix
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [3] Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study
    Christensen, Louise Fischer
    Overgaard, Charlotte
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [4] Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study
    Louise Fischer Christensen
    Charlotte Overgaard
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [5] A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of ‘low risk’ births in the birthplace in England cohort
    Jennifer Hollowell
    Yangmei Li
    Kathryn Bunch
    Peter Brocklehurst
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [6] A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort
    Hollowell, Jennifer
    Li, Yangmei
    Bunch, Kathryn
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [7] The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications
    Schroeder, Liz
    Patel, Nishma
    Keeler, Michelle
    Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
    Macfarlane, Alison J.
    MIDWIFERY, 2017, 45 : 28 - 35
  • [8] The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit
    Ferrazzi, Enrico
    Visconti, Elena
    Paganelli, Andrea M.
    Campi, Carmen M.
    Lazzeri, Cristina
    Cirillo, Federico
    Livio, Stefania
    Piola, Cinzia
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (13): : 1530 - 1536
  • [9] Outcomes associated with transfusion in low-risk women with obstetric haemorrhage
    Patterson, Jillian A.
    Nippita, Tanya A.
    Randall, Deborah
    Irving, David O.
    Ford, Jane B.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2018, 113 (07) : 678 - 685
  • [10] Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?
    Coulm, Benedicte
    Le Ray, Camille
    Lelong, Nathalie
    Drewniak, Nicolas
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    Blondel, Beatrice
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2012, 39 (03): : 183 - 191