Patients' openness to discussing implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at end of life: a cross-sectional study

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Kyoung Suk [1 ]
Oh, Oonjee [1 ]
Miller, Jennifer [2 ]
Hammash, Muna [3 ]
Thompson, David R. [4 ]
Ski, Chantal F. [5 ]
Cameron, Jan [6 ]
Hwang, Seon Young [7 ]
Moser, Debra K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Nursing, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Nursing, 751 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Sch Nursing, 555 S Floyd St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast BT9 7BL, Antrim, North Ireland
[5] Univ Suffolk, Integrated Care Acad, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, Suffolk, England
[6] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci Monash Hlth, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[7] Hanyang Univ, Coll Nursing, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Shared decision-making; Patient preference; Cross-sectional studies; EXPERT CONSENSUS STATEMENT; PATIENTS NEARING END; OF-LIFE; HEART-FAILURE; REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL; DEVICE DEACTIVATION; ELECTRONIC DEVICES; ICD DEACTIVATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1093/eurjcn/zvab130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims It is recommended that patients and clinicians discuss end-of-life deactivation of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prior to device implantation and throughout the illness trajectory to facilitate shared decision-making. However, such discussions rarely occur, and little is known about patients' openness to this discussion. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with patients' openness to discussing end-of-life ICD deactivation with clinicians. Methods and results This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with an ICD from outpatient clinics in the USA, Australia, and South Korea. Patients were classified into an open or resistant group based on their desire to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors related to patients' openness to this discussion. About half of the participants (57.7%) were open to discussing such issues with their clinicians. Factors related to patients' openness to discussing device deactivation at end of life were living with someone, not having severe comorbid conditions (cancer and/or chronic kidney disease), greater ICD knowledge, and more experience discussing end-of-life issues with clinicians (odds ratio: 0.479, 0.382, 1.172, 1.332, respectively). Conclusion Approximately half of the ICD recipients were reluctant to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Unmodifiable factors were their living arrangement and severe comorbidity. ICD knowledge and prior experience discussing end-of-life issues were potentially modifiable factors in the future. These factors should be addressed when assessing patients' readiness for a shared discussion about device deactivation at end of life.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 693
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceived Control in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Cross-Sectional Survey From US and Australia
    Hammash, Muna H.
    Miller, Jennifer
    Chung, Misook
    Crawford, Timothy
    Haedtke, Christine
    Elayi, Samy Claude
    Lee, Kyoung Suk
    Czarapata, Mary
    McEvedy, Samantha
    Cameron, Jan
    Harman, Jessica
    Bidle, Martha
    Moser, Debra
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [22] Re: Compromised Sexual Health among Male Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study
    Seftel, Allen D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (04): : 643 - 643
  • [23] Deactivation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator at the end-of-life; how do healthcare professionals decide?
    Hill, L. M.
    Hill, L. M.
    Mcilfatrick, S. J.
    Mcilfatrick, S. J.
    Taylor, B. J.
    Dixon, L.
    Cole, B. R.
    Moser, D. K.
    Fitzsimons, D.
    Fitzsimons, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 380 - 380
  • [24] Octo-nonagenerians outlook on life and death when living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A cross-sectional study
    Thylen, I.
    Stromberg, A.
    Moser, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2016, 15 : S34 - S34
  • [25] Deactivation Status of Defibrillation at the End of Life in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Narumi, Shoko
    Kondo, Yusuke
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Kajiyama, Takatsugu
    Ito, Ryo
    Chiba, Toshinori
    Ryuzaki, Satoko
    Yoshino, Yutaka
    Komai, Yuya
    Takanashi, Yukiko
    Kobayashi, Yoshio
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [26] Patient experiences of shared decision-making are associated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients" openness to discuss device deactivation at end-of-life
    Oh, O. J.
    Lee, K. S.
    Miller, J.
    Hammash, M.
    Thompson, D. R.
    Ski, C. F.
    Cameron, J.
    Moser, D. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2021, 20 : 102 - 102
  • [27] Deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at end of life
    Pettit, Stephen J.
    Jackson, Colette E.
    Gardner, Roy S.
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (06) : 885 - 896
  • [28] IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR DEACTIVATION IN END OF LIFE CARE: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF DEACTIVATION TRENDS FROM 2011-2014
    Churchouse, Wendy
    Rees, Paul
    Anderson, Mark
    Warren, Claire
    Griffiths, Andrew
    Bouwer, Nicholas
    HEART, 2015, 101 : A38 - A39
  • [29] Comparison of depression and anxiety among pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: A cross-sectional study
    Rafsanjani, Mojgan Haj Ahmadi Pour
    Masoudi, Sima
    Radmanesh, Majid
    Bostani, Zahra
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (02): : 235 - 239
  • [30] I'D think my doctor was crazy. Patients' reactions to discussing deactivation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life
    Goldstein, NE
    Mehta, D
    Siddiqui, S
    Teitelbaum, E
    Singson, M
    Pe, E
    Bradley, EH
    Morrison, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2006, 54 (04) : S77 - S78