Patients' openness to discussing implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at end of life: a cross-sectional study

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Kyoung Suk [1 ]
Oh, Oonjee [1 ]
Miller, Jennifer [2 ]
Hammash, Muna [3 ]
Thompson, David R. [4 ]
Ski, Chantal F. [5 ]
Cameron, Jan [6 ]
Hwang, Seon Young [7 ]
Moser, Debra K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Nursing, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Nursing, 751 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Sch Nursing, 555 S Floyd St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast BT9 7BL, Antrim, North Ireland
[5] Univ Suffolk, Integrated Care Acad, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, Suffolk, England
[6] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci Monash Hlth, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[7] Hanyang Univ, Coll Nursing, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Shared decision-making; Patient preference; Cross-sectional studies; EXPERT CONSENSUS STATEMENT; PATIENTS NEARING END; OF-LIFE; HEART-FAILURE; REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL; DEVICE DEACTIVATION; ELECTRONIC DEVICES; ICD DEACTIVATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1093/eurjcn/zvab130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims It is recommended that patients and clinicians discuss end-of-life deactivation of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prior to device implantation and throughout the illness trajectory to facilitate shared decision-making. However, such discussions rarely occur, and little is known about patients' openness to this discussion. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with patients' openness to discussing end-of-life ICD deactivation with clinicians. Methods and results This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with an ICD from outpatient clinics in the USA, Australia, and South Korea. Patients were classified into an open or resistant group based on their desire to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors related to patients' openness to this discussion. About half of the participants (57.7%) were open to discussing such issues with their clinicians. Factors related to patients' openness to discussing device deactivation at end of life were living with someone, not having severe comorbid conditions (cancer and/or chronic kidney disease), greater ICD knowledge, and more experience discussing end-of-life issues with clinicians (odds ratio: 0.479, 0.382, 1.172, 1.332, respectively). Conclusion Approximately half of the ICD recipients were reluctant to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Unmodifiable factors were their living arrangement and severe comorbidity. ICD knowledge and prior experience discussing end-of-life issues were potentially modifiable factors in the future. These factors should be addressed when assessing patients' readiness for a shared discussion about device deactivation at end of life.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 693
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge and end-of-life device deactivation: A cross-sectional survey
    McEvedy, Samantha M.
    Cameron, Jan
    Lugg, Eugene
    Miller, Jennifer
    Haedtke, Chris
    Hammash, Muna
    Biddle, Martha J.
    Lee, Kyoung Suk
    Mariani, Justin A.
    Ski, Chantal F.
    Thompson, David R.
    Chung, Misook Lee
    Moser, Debra K.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (01) : 156 - 163
  • [3] Patients' perception of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at the end of life
    Hill, Loreena
    McIlfatrick, Sonja
    Taylor, Brian
    Dixon, Lana
    Harbinson, Mark
    Fitzsimons, Donna
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (04) : 310 - 323
  • [4] IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER - DEFIBRILLATOR DEACTIVATION IN PATIENTS NEARING THE END OF LIFE
    Floria, Mariana
    Rezus, Ciprian
    Ciutea, Mirela Paraschiva
    Ambarus, Valentin
    REVISTA ROMANA DE BIOETICA, 2012, 10 (01) : 134 - 140
  • [5] An Irish cross sectional survey of patients knowledge of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and their deactivation at end of life.
    Mcdermott, E.
    Mooney, M.
    Odonnell, S.
    Mckee, G.
    Obrien, F.
    Ryan, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2018, 17 : 75 - 76
  • [6] Deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator at end of life
    Gradalski, Tomasz
    Smyczynska, Malgorzata
    MEDYCYNA PALIATYWNA-PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 7 (03): : 201 - 204
  • [7] Patients' Perspective on Deactivation of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Near the End of Life
    Pedersen, Susanne S.
    Chaitsing, Rismy
    Szili-Torok, Tamas
    Jordaens, Luc
    Theuns, Dominic A. M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 111 (10): : 1443 - 1447
  • [8] PACEMAKER AND IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) DEACTIVATION NEAR END OF LIFE
    Mcloughlin, P.
    Taylor, A.
    Doelman, L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S423 - S423
  • [9] Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator deactivation at the end of life: A physician survey
    Kehey, Amy S.
    Reid, M. Carrington
    Miller, David H.
    Fins, Joseph J.
    Lachs, Mark S.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 157 (04) : 702 - 708
  • [10] PSYCHOSOCIAL DISTRESS IN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR PATIENTS; A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH A GENDER PERSPECTIVE
    Thylen, I.
    Moser, D.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 126 : 314 - 314