Lung and Heart Allocation in the United States

被引:101
|
作者
Colvin-Adams, M. [1 ,2 ]
Valapour, M. [1 ,3 ]
Hertz, M. [1 ,3 ]
Heubner, B. [1 ]
Paulson, K. [3 ]
Dhungel, V. [2 ]
Skeans, M. A. [1 ]
Edwards, L. [4 ]
Ghimire, V. [4 ]
Waller, C. [4 ]
Cherikh, W. S. [4 ]
Kasiske, B. L. [1 ,5 ]
Snyder, J. J. [1 ,6 ]
Israni, A. K. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Minneapolis Med Res Fdn Inc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Heart allograft; lung allograft; organ allocation; transplant waiting list; transplantation; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION; ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION; PROCUREMENT; CANDIDATES; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; NETWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04258.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Lung and heart allocation in the United States has evolved over the past 2030 years to better serve transplant candidates and improve organ utilization. The current lung allocation policy, based on the Lung Allocation Score, attempts to take into account risk of death on the waiting list and chance of survival posttransplant. This policy is flexible and can be adjusted to improve the predictive ability of the score. Similarly, in response to the changing clinical phenotype of heart transplant candidates, heart allocation policies have evolved to a multitiered algorithm that attempts to prioritize organs to the most infirm, a designation that fluctuates with trends in therapy. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and its committees have been responsive, as demonstrated by recent modifications to pediatric heart allocation and mechanical circulatory support policies and by ongoing efforts to ensure that heart allocation policies are equitable and current. Here we examine the development of US lung and heart allocation policy, evaluate the application of the current policy on clinical practice and explore future directions for lung and heart allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:3213 / 3234
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Impact of the New Heart Allocation Policy on the Treatment of United States Adult Heart Transplant Candidates
    Chung, K.
    Anderson, A. S.
    Siegler, M.
    Churpek, M. M.
    Parker, W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 369 - 369
  • [22] Early Outcome of Heart-Kidney Transplantation in the Current Heart Allocation System in the United States
    Rao, S.
    Doyle, A.
    Brennan, D.
    Constantinescu, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 385 - 385
  • [23] United States liver allocation
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 25 (02) : 104 - 109
  • [24] Perspectives on donor lung allocation from both sides of the Atlantic: The United States
    Tsuang, Wayne M.
    Snyder, Laurie D.
    Budev, Marie M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 34 (07)
  • [25] Exploring Physician Perceptions of the 2018 United States Heart Transplant Allocation System
    Defilippis, Ersilia M.
    Psotka, Mitchell A.
    Khazanie, Prateeti
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2022, 28 (04) : 670 - 674
  • [26] The new United States heart allocation policy: Progress through collaborative revision
    Davies, Ryan R.
    Farr, Maryjane
    Silvestry, Scott
    Callahan, Liz Robbins
    Edwards, Leah
    Meyer, Dan M.
    Uccellini, Kimberly
    Chan, Kevin M.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (06): : 595 - 596
  • [27] Major advantages and critical challenge for the proposed United States heart allocation system
    Stevenson, Lynne Warner
    Kormos, Robert L.
    Young, James B.
    Kirklin, James K.
    Hunt, Sharon A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (05): : 547 - 549
  • [28] Lung allocation in the United States, 1995-1997: An analysis of equity and utility
    Pierson, RN
    Milstone, AP
    Loyd, JE
    Lewis, BH
    Pinson, CW
    Ely, EW
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 19 (09): : 846 - 851
  • [29] United States National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Proteomics Initiative
    Schachte, M
    PROTEOMICS, 2005, 5 (09) : 2285 - 2285
  • [30] Impact of new allocation system on length of stay following heart transplantation in the United States
    Doulamis, Ilias P.
    Gemelli, Marco
    Rempakos, Thanasis
    Tzani, Aspasia
    Oh, Nicholas A.
    Kampaktsis, Polydoros
    Guariento, Alvise
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Alvarez, Paulino
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023,