Investigation of Training Multiple Instance Learning Networks with Instance Sampling

被引:0
|
作者
Tarkhan, Aliasghar [1 ]
Trung Kien Nguyen [2 ]
Simon, Noah [1 ]
Dai, Jian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Genentech Inc, PHC Imaging Grp, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
关键词
Attention; Computational pathology; Deep learning; Multiple instance learning; Prostate cancer; Sampling; Transfer learning; Weekly supervised learning; Second keyword; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-16876-5_10
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
One challenge of training deep neural networks with gigapixel whole-slide images (WSIs) is the lack of annotation at pixel level or patch (instance) level due to the high cost and time-consuming labeling effort. Multiple instance learning (MIL) as a typical weakly supervised learning method aimed to resolve this challenge by using only the slide-level label without needing patch labels. Not all patches/instances are predictive of the outcome. The attention-based MIL method leverages this fact to enhance the performance by weighting the instances based on their contribution to predicting the outcome. A WSI typically contains hundreds of thousands of image patches. Training a deep neural network with thousands of image patches per slide is computationally expensive and requires a lot of time for convergence. One way to alleviate this issue is to sample a subset of instances/patches from the available instances within each bag for training. While the benefit of sampling strategies for decreasing computing time might be evident, there is a lack of effort to investigate their performances. This project proposes and compares an adaptive sampling strategy with other sampling strategies. Although all sampling strategies substantially reduce computation time, their performance is influenced by the number of selected instances. We show that if we are limited to only select a few instances (e.g., in order of 1 similar to 10 instances), the adaptive sampling outperforms other sampling strategies. However, if we are allowed to select more instances (e.g., in order of 100 similar to 1000 instances), the random sampling outperforms other sampling strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 104
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Discriminative and Consistent Similarities in Instance-Level Multiple Instance Learning
    Rastegari, Mohammad
    Hajishirzi, Hannaneh
    Farhadi, Ali
    2015 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2015, : 740 - 748
  • [32] Pairwise-similarity-based instance reduction for efficient instance selection in multiple-instance learning
    Yuan, Liming
    Liu, Jiafeng
    Tang, Xianglong
    Shi, Daming
    Zhao, Lu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2015, 6 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [33] Revisiting multiple instance neural networks
    Wang, Xinggang
    Yan, Yongluan
    Tang, Peng
    Bai, Xiang
    Liu, Wenyu
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2018, 74 : 15 - 24
  • [34] Pairwise-similarity-based instance reduction for efficient instance selection in multiple-instance learning
    Liming Yuan
    Jiafeng Liu
    Xianglong Tang
    Daming Shi
    Lu Zhao
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2015, 6 : 83 - 93
  • [35] Multiple Instance Learning via Multiple Kernel Learning
    Yang, Bing
    Li, Qian
    Jing, Ling
    Zhen, Ling
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 12 : 160 - 167
  • [36] Multiple Instance Learning for Uplift Modeling
    Zhao, Yao
    Zhang, Haipeng
    Lyu, Shiwei
    Jiang, Ruiying
    Gu, Jinjie
    Zhang, Guannan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2022, 2022, : 4727 - 4731
  • [37] Label Stability in Multiple Instance Learning
    Cheplygina, Veronika
    Sorensen, Lauge
    Tax, David M. J.
    de Bruijne, Marleen
    Loog, Marco
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2015, PT I, 2015, 9349 : 539 - 546
  • [38] Multiple instance learning with bag dissimilarities
    Cheplygina, Veronika
    Tax, David M. J.
    Loog, Marco
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2015, 48 (01) : 264 - 275
  • [39] Multiple Instance Learning for Uplift Modeling
    Zhao, Yao
    Zhang, Haipeng
    Lyu, Shiwei
    Jiang, Ruiying
    Gu, Jinjie
    Zhang, Guannan
    International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 2022, : 4727 - 4731
  • [40] Classification of COPD with Multiple Instance Learning
    Cheplygina, Veronika
    Sorensen, Lauge
    Tax, David M. J.
    Pedersen, Jesper Holst
    Loog, Marco
    de Bruijne, Marleen
    2014 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2014, : 1508 - 1513