FOSTERING TEACHING STAFF'S ENGAGEMENT IN CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Ruiz-Callado, Raul [1 ]
Luis Nicolau-Gonzalbez, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
关键词
continuous assessment; European Higher Education Area; teaching staff;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Among the factors that affect the convergence towards the European Higher Education Area, university teaching staff's motivation is fundamental, and consequently, it is crucial to empirically know what this motivation depends on. In this context, one of the most relevant changes in the teacher-student relationship is assessment. In fact, the transition from a static assessment -focused on only one temporal point (final exam)- to a dynamic assessment, will require changes in thought and action, both on the part of teachers and students. In this line, the objective of this paper is to analyze the determinants of teaching staff's predisposition to the continuous assessment method. Specifically, we consider the following explanatory dimensions: teaching method used (which measures their degree of involvement with the ongoing adaptation process), type of subject (core, compulsory and optional), and teacher's personal characteristics (professional status and gender). The empirical application carried out at the University of Alicante uses Logit Models with Random Coefficients to capture heterogeneity, and shows that "cooperative learning" is a clear-cut determinant of "continuous assessment" as well as "continuous assessment plus final examination". Also, a conspicuous result, which in turn becomes a thought-provoking finding, is that professional status is highly relevant as a teacher's engagement is closely related to prospects of stability. Consequently, the most relevant implications from the results revolve around the way academic institutions can propose and implement inducement for their teaching staff.
引用
收藏
页码:3054 / 3060
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Are students gender-neutral in their assessment of online teaching staff?
    Wong, Jennifer S.
    Bouchard, Jessica
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (05) : 719 - 739
  • [32] Investigation on the quantitative position assessment system of college teaching staff
    Zhao, JH
    Li, XH
    Li, BH
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vols 1-9, 2005, : 3221 - 3224
  • [33] Grounds for a subjective assessment of academic and teaching staff pay equity
    Efimova, Galina Z.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2022, (476): : 139 - 145
  • [34] Teaching Teaching Skills: The Development and Assessment of an Educational Program for Pharmacy Residents and Staff Pharmacists
    Zhu, Lisa M.
    Hardy, Brian
    Diamantouros, Artemis
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2007, 60 : 66 - 66
  • [35] Fostering Engagement with Personal Informatics Systems
    Gulotta, Rebecca
    Forlizzi, Jodi
    Yang, Rayoung
    Newman, Mark W.
    DIS 2016: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS, 2016, : 286 - 299
  • [36] Best Practices: Fostering Community Engagement
    Kwun, Aileen
    ARCHITECT, 2019, 108 (09): : 26 - 26
  • [37] AN EVALUATION OF THE USE OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT IN THE TEACHING OF PHYSIOLOGY
    TAN, CM
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 23 (03) : 255 - 272
  • [38] TEACHING STAFF
    不详
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 50 (07): : 194 - 194
  • [39] Fostering Engagement in an Era of Dissipating Publics
    Clark, Lynn Schofield
    RETHINKING MEDIA RESEARCH FOR CHANGING SOCIETIES, 2020, : 153 - 167
  • [40] Learning Communities: Fostering Engagement in AT Education
    Peer, Kimberly S.
    Huston, Jeffery
    ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY, 2009, 14 (03): : 32 - 35