A multicenter experience with novel implantable cardioverter defibrillator configurations in the pediatric and congenital heart disease population

被引:0
|
作者
Stephenson, EA
Batra, AS
Knilans, TK
Gow, RM
Gradaus, R
Balaji, S
Dubin, AM
Rhee, EK
Ro, PS
Thogersen, AM
Cecchin, F
Triedman, JK
Walsh, EP
Berul, CI
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Boston, Boston, MA USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[6] Univ Klinikum Munster, Med Klin & Poliklin C, Munster, Germany
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[9] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[10] Columbus Childrens Hosp, Columbus, OH USA
[11] Rigshosp, Hjertectr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
pediatric; implantable defibrillator; congenital heart disease;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Novel ICD Configurations in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease. Introduction: In pediatric and congenital heart disease patients, transvenous ICD implantation may be limited secondary to patient size, venous, or cardiac anatomy. Epicardial patches require a thoracotomy, and may lead to a restrictive pericardial process. Because of these issues, we have explored novel ICD configurations. Methods: Retrospective review at 10 centers implanting ICDs without a transvenous shocking coil or epicardial patches. Results: Twenty-two patients underwent implant at a mean age of 8.9 years (range: 0.3-43.5), with a mean weight of 25.5 kg (range: 5.2-70). Diagnoses included complex CHD, intracardiac tumors, cardiomyopathy, idiopathic VT, LV noncompaction, and long QT syndrome. Three configurations were used: subcutaneous array, a transvenous design ICD lead placed on the epicardium, or a transvenous design ICD lead placed subcutaneously. Difficulties were found at implant in 8 patients: 4 had difficulty inducing VT/VF, and 4 had high DFTs. Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 years (range: 0.2-10.5), 7 patients had appropriate shocks. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 4 patients. System revisions were required in 7 patients: 2 generator changes (in 1 patient), 3 pace-sense lead replacement, 1 additional subcutaneous coil placement due to increased DFT, 1 upgrade to a transvenous system, and 1 revision to epicardial patch system. Conclusions: ICD implantation can be performed without epicardial patches or transvenous high-energy leads in this population, using individualized techniques. This will allow ICD use in patients who have intracardiac shunting or are deemed too small for transvenous ICD leads. The long-term outcome and possible complications are as yet unknown in this population, and they should be monitored closely with follow-up DFTs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURAL HEART-DISEASE - A MULTICENTER EXPERIENCE WITH IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR THERAPY
    MEISSNER, MD
    LEHMANN, MH
    STEINMAN, RT
    MOSTELLER, RD
    AKHTAR, M
    CALKINS, H
    CANNOM, DS
    EPSTEIN, AE
    FOGOROS, RN
    LIEM, LB
    MARCHLINSKI, FE
    MYERBURG, RJ
    VELTRI, EP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (06) : 1406 - 1412
  • [42] Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Early Experience
    Oliva Souza, Fernando Sergio
    Sepulvida, Vanessa
    Valerio Almeida, Marcos Cesar
    Weiss, Samuel Campagiotto
    Borges Rodrigues, Lucas Henrique
    Gori Lima, Pedro Augusto
    Mattos, Davi Bongiolo
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 32 (06) : 498 - 502
  • [43] CONTINUING EXPERIENCE WITH THE AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
    PAULL, DL
    FELLOWS, CL
    GUYTON, SW
    ANDERSON, RP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (05): : 502 - 504
  • [44] Living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: The patients' experience
    Humphreys, Nina K.
    Lowe, Rob
    Rance, Jaynie
    Bennett, Paul D.
    HEART & LUNG, 2016, 45 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [45] EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH THE SUBSTERNAL IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
    Hermes-Laufer, Julia
    Molitor, Nadine
    Gruszczynski, Michal
    Breitenstein, Alexander
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2024, 154 : 51S - 51S
  • [46] The daily experience of the patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    Palacios-Cena, Domingo
    Alonso-Blanco, Cristina
    Cachon-Perez, Jose Miguel
    Alvarez-Lopez, Cristina
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2010, 20 (02): : 97 - 104
  • [47] Predictors of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in patients with nonischemic heart disease
    Rankovic, V
    Karha, J
    Passman, R
    Kadish, AH
    Goldberger, J
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 396 - 396
  • [48] Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Extraction First Multicenter French Experience
    Behar, Nathalie
    Galand, Vincent
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Jacon, Peggy
    Badenco, Nicolas
    Blangy, Hugues
    Alonso, Christine
    Guy-Moyat, Benoit
    El Bouazzaoui, Rim
    Lebon, Alain
    Giraudeau, Cedric
    Marquie, Christelle
    Leclercq, Christophe
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 863 - 870
  • [49] Life threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with minimal or no structural heart disease: Experience with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    Manios, E
    Fenelon, G
    Malacky, T
    Fo, AL
    Brugada, P
    HEARTWEB, 1997, 2 (03): : U24 - U30
  • [50] Multicenter Experience With Extraction of the Sprint Fidelis Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Reply
    Maytin, Melanie
    Love, Charles J.
    Fischer, Avi
    Carrillo, Roger G.
    Garisto, Juan D.
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Segreti, Luca
    John, Roy M.
    Michaud, Gregory F.
    Albert, Christine M.
    Epstein, Laurence M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (05) : 636 - 636