Comparing carbon substrates for denitrification of subsurface drainage water

被引:181
|
作者
Greenan, Colin M.
Moorman, Thomas B. [1 ]
Kaspar, Thomas C.
Parkin, Timothy B.
Jaynes, Dan B.
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2005.0247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrate in water from tile drained corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] fields in the U.S. Midwest contributes to nitrate contamination of surface waters. Denitrification-based biofilters are a promising strategy for reducing nitrate concentrations, but these systems require an external carbon supply to sustain denitrification. The ability of four organic materials to serve as carbon substrates for denitrification biofilters was evaluated in this laboratory study. Wood chips, wood chips amended with soybean oil, cornstalks, and cardboard fibers were mixed with subsoil (oxidized till) and incubated anaerobically for 180 d. Periodically, (NO3)-N-15-N was added to maintain nitrate N concentrations between 10 and 100 mg L-1. All of the materials stimulated NO3-N removal and the degree of removal from highest to lowest was: cornstalks, cardboard fibers, wood chips with oil, and wood chips alone. Analysis of N-15 showed that immobilization and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium accounted for < 4% of NO3-N removal in all treatments, therefore denitrification was the dominant NO3-N removal process. Cardboard fibers, wood chips and oil, and wood chips alone did not support as much denitrification as cornstalks, but their rates of NO3-N removal were steady and would probably continue longer than cornstalks. The addition of soybean oil to wood chips significantly increased denitrification over wood chips alone.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 829
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shallow subsurface drainage in an irrigated vertisol with a perched water table
    CSIRO Division of Water Resources, Griffith Laboratory, PMB No 3, Griffith, NSW 2680, Australia
    Agric. Water Manage., 3 (261-282):
  • [32] Estimating the volume of subsurface drainage water under different crops
    Kaledhonkar, M.J.
    Kamra, S.K.
    Sharma, D.P.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Agricultural Engineering Division, 2002, 83 (DEC.): : 44 - 48
  • [33] Subsurface Drainage and Water-Saving Irrigation in Sustainable Agriculture
    Fujimaki, Haruyuki
    WATER, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [34] Irrigation water saving by management of existing subsurface drainage in Egypt
    Wahba, MAS
    Christen, EW
    Amer, MH
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2005, 54 (02) : 205 - 215
  • [35] SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE WATER-QUALITY FROM STRUCTURED SOIL
    SHALIT, G
    STEENHUIS, TS
    HAKVOORT, HM
    BOLL, J
    GEOHRING, LD
    VANES, HM
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (03): : 239 - 247
  • [37] Simulating nitrogen management effects on subsurface drainage water quality
    Azevedo, AS
    Singh, P
    Kanwar, RS
    Ahuja, LR
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 55 (04) : 481 - 501
  • [38] Bacteria supported on carbon films for water denitrification
    Valverde-Sarmiento, Carmen
    Espinosa-Iglesias, David
    Isidora Bautista-Toledo, Ma
    Alvarez-Merino, Miguel A.
    Maldonado-Hodar, Francisco J.
    Carrasco-Marin, Francisco
    Perez-Cadenas, Agustin F.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 259 : 424 - 429
  • [39] Bacteria supported on carbon films for water denitrification
    Pérez-Cadenas, Agustín F., 1600, Elsevier B.V., Netherlands (259):
  • [40] DENITRIFICATION VARIABILITY AND CONTROL IN A RIPARIAN FEN IRRIGATED WITH AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE WATER
    AMBUS, P
    CHRISTENSEN, S
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 25 (07): : 915 - 923