Comparing carbon substrates for denitrification of subsurface drainage water

被引:181
|
作者
Greenan, Colin M.
Moorman, Thomas B. [1 ]
Kaspar, Thomas C.
Parkin, Timothy B.
Jaynes, Dan B.
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2005.0247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrate in water from tile drained corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] fields in the U.S. Midwest contributes to nitrate contamination of surface waters. Denitrification-based biofilters are a promising strategy for reducing nitrate concentrations, but these systems require an external carbon supply to sustain denitrification. The ability of four organic materials to serve as carbon substrates for denitrification biofilters was evaluated in this laboratory study. Wood chips, wood chips amended with soybean oil, cornstalks, and cardboard fibers were mixed with subsoil (oxidized till) and incubated anaerobically for 180 d. Periodically, (NO3)-N-15-N was added to maintain nitrate N concentrations between 10 and 100 mg L-1. All of the materials stimulated NO3-N removal and the degree of removal from highest to lowest was: cornstalks, cardboard fibers, wood chips with oil, and wood chips alone. Analysis of N-15 showed that immobilization and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium accounted for < 4% of NO3-N removal in all treatments, therefore denitrification was the dominant NO3-N removal process. Cardboard fibers, wood chips and oil, and wood chips alone did not support as much denitrification as cornstalks, but their rates of NO3-N removal were steady and would probably continue longer than cornstalks. The addition of soybean oil to wood chips significantly increased denitrification over wood chips alone.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 829
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Three Carbon Substrates with Cow Dung Liquid for Denitrification of Agricultural Drainage Water
    Lai, Jiang
    Wang, Xiugui
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2021, 30 (04): : 3677 - 3684
  • [2] Reducing nitrogen contamination from agricultural subsurface drainage with denitrification bioreactors and controlled drainage
    Husk, Barry R.
    Anderson, Bruce C.
    Whalen, Joann K.
    Sanchez, Juan S.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 153 : 52 - 62
  • [3] Denitrification of agricultural drainage line water via immobilized denitrification sludge
    Hunt, Patrick G.
    Matheny, Terry A.
    Ro, Kyoung S.
    Stone, Kenneth C.
    Vanotti, Matias B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 43 (09): : 1077 - 1084
  • [4] Comparing surface and subsurface drainage in rice irrigation systems of Kazakhstan
    Dzhumabekov, AA
    INTER-RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE ARAL SEA BASIN, 1996, 22 : 91 - 93
  • [5] Subsurface drainage and water quality: The Illinois experience
    Kalita, P. K.
    Cooke, R. A. C.
    Anderson, S. M.
    Hirschi, M. C.
    Mitchell, J. K.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (05) : 1651 - 1656
  • [6] REDUCING WATER-POLLUTION WITH SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
    BENGTSON, RL
    CARTER, CE
    MORRIS, HF
    KOWALCZUK, JG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1984, 27 (01): : 80 - 83
  • [7] NITRATE, PHOSPHORUS, AND SULFATE IN SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE WATER
    BAKER, JL
    CAMPBELL, KL
    JOHNSON, HP
    HANWAY, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1975, 4 (03) : 406 - 412
  • [8] Effect of saline drainage water on performance of denitrification bioreactors
    Faramarzmanesh, Sasan
    Mashal, Mahmoud
    Garmdareh, Seyyed Ebrahim Hashemi
    WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (01) : 98 - 107
  • [9] Enhancement of denitrification with sucrose-enriched subsurface irrigation water
    Andrade, MD
    Prasher, SO
    Ahmad, D
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2002, 45 (06): : 1749 - 1755
  • [10] Enhancement of Denitrification with Sucrose-Enriched Subsurface Irrigation Water
    Andrade, M.-D.
    Prasher, S.O.
    Ahmad, D.
    Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2002, 45 (06): : 1749 - 1755