Generative models for reproducible coronary calcium scoring

被引:5
|
作者
van Velzen, Sanne G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
de Vos, Bob D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Noothout, Julia M. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Verkooijen, Helena M. [5 ]
Viergever, Max A. [4 ]
Isgum, Ivana [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Cardiovasc Sci, Heart Failure & Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Sci, Informat Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Imaging Div, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
calcium scoring; reproducibility; computed tomography; generative models; cycle-consistent generative adversarial network; ARTERY CALCIUM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CT; QUANTIFICATION; CALCIFICATION; NETWORKS; MOTION; SCANS;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.9.5.052406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, i.e., the amount of CAC quantified in CT, is a strong and independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, CAC scoring suffers from limited interscan reproducibility, which is mainly due to the clinical definition requiring application of a fixed intensity level threshold for segmentation of calcifications. This limitation is especially pronounced in non-electrocardiogram-synchronized computed tomography (CT) where lesions are more impacted by cardiac motion and partial volume effects. Therefore, we propose a CAC quantification method that does not require a threshold for segmentation of CAC. Approach: Our method utilizes a generative adversarial network (GAN) where a CT with CAC is decomposed into an image without CAC and an image showing only CAC. The method, using a cycle-consistent GAN, was trained using 626 low-dose chest CTs and 514 radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) CTs. Interscan reproducibility was compared to clinical calcium scoring in RTP CTs of 1662 patients, each having two scans. Results: A lower relative interscan difference in CAC mass was achieved by the proposed method: 47% compared to 89% manual clinical calcium scoring. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Agatston scores was 0.96 for the proposed method compared to 0.91 for automatic clinical calcium scoring. Conclusions: The increased interscan reproducibility achieved by our method may lead to increased reliability of CHD risk categorization and improved accuracy of CHD event prediction. (C) 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening for coronary atherosclerosis with coronary calcium scoring: The “shape” of things to come?
    Assem Vashist
    Robert O. Bonow
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2008, 15 : 162 - 169
  • [32] Screening for coronary atherosclerosis with coronary calcium scoring: The "shape" of things to come?
    Vashist, Aseem
    Bonow, Robert O.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (02) : 162 - 169
  • [33] Influence of BMI on virtual coronary artery calcium scoring
    Perez-Cervera, Javier
    Arce, Javier
    Fattouh, Michael
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Schenone, Aldo L.
    Brahmanandam, Vikram
    Lee, Un Jung
    Haramati, Linda B.
    Levsky, Jeffrey M.
    Villines, Todd C.
    Garcia, Mario J.
    Slipczuk, Leandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 39 (04): : 863 - 872
  • [34] Interplatform Reproducibility of CT Coronary Calcium Scoring Software
    Weininger, Markus
    Ritz, Kristin S.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Flohr, Thomas G.
    Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
    Costello, Philip
    Hahn, Dietbert
    Beissert, Matthias
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) : 70 - 77
  • [35] Influence of BMI on virtual coronary artery calcium scoring
    Javier Perez-Cervera
    Javier Arce
    Michael Fattouh
    Toshiki Kuno
    Aldo L Schenone
    Vikram Brahmanandam
    Un Jung Lee
    Linda B Haramati
    Jeffrey M Levsky
    Todd C Villines
    Mario J Garcia
    Leandro Slipczuk
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023, 39 : 863 - 872
  • [36] Effects of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring
    Pozo, Eduardo
    Cham, Matthew
    Kadoch, Michael
    Yankelevitz, David
    Hensche, Claudia
    Yip, Rowena
    Matarazzo, Thomas
    Hecht, Harvey
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [37] Coronary Calcium Scoring without Dedicated Noncontrast CT
    Goldfarb, James W.
    Cao, J. Jane
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (02) : 317 - 318
  • [38] Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Is It Time for a Change in Methodology?
    Blaha, Michael J.
    Mortensen, Martin Bodtker
    Kianoush, Sina
    Tota-Maharaj, Rajesh
    Cainzos-Achirica, Miguel
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 10 (08) : 924 - 937
  • [39] Coronary calcium scoring: What does it really mean?
    Cerqueira, MD
    Rumsey, MP
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 692 - 695
  • [40] CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORING ON ROUTINE PET/CT
    Ng, Wesley
    Lee, Sze Ting
    Welch, Jessica
    Desmond, Sherylene
    Saleem, Schimmel
    Pathmaraj, Kunthi
    Wright, Samuel
    Scott, Andrew M.
    Berlangieri, Salvatore
    Rowe, Christopher
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 43 : 1 - 1