Towards a New Relationship Between Trade Mark Law and Psychology

被引:3
|
作者
Burrell, Robert [1 ]
Weatherall, Kimberlee [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Law Sch, Law, Bartolome House,Winter St, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney Law Sch, Law, Camperdown Campus,Law Sch Bldg F10,Eastern Ave, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
RECOGNITION; NAME;
D O I
10.1093/clp/cuy001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Trade mark law and cognitive psychology are both concerned with establishing the mental states of consumers: in theory then we might expect these disciplines to have a close relationship, and to be engaged in ongoing dialogue. This is not the case and on further examination, real difficulties emerge, especially arising from trade mark laws registration system. It is not simple to reconcile the goals, and the philosophical foundations, of these two disciplines. This article makes the argument that insights from psychology can play an important role in trade mark law, but for that to happen, we need to move away from the idea that insights from psychology are only useful to decide particular disputes before the courts. A better approach is to test trade mark law at a higher level of abstraction: to test trade mark law s assumptions about how consumers process information. Starting at this level could inform trade mark law, without disrupting the registration system.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 118
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRADE MARK LAW OPENS BRAND BONANZA
    GOODWIN, B
    PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (18) : 12 - 12
  • [32] HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF TRADE-MARK LAW
    不详
    SOCIAL FORCES, 1926, 5 (01) : 175 - 178
  • [33] Recognition in context: Implications for trade mark law
    Michael S. Humphreys
    Kimberley A. McFarlane
    Jennifer S. Burt
    Sarah J. Kelly
    Kimberlee G. Weatherall
    Robert G. Burrell
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24 : 1665 - 1672
  • [34] Concise European Trade Mark and Design Law
    Milchior, Richard
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2012, 7 (04) : 298 - 298
  • [35] European trade mark law, Quo Vadis?
    Leppink, Willem
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2013, 8 (05) : 337 - 338
  • [36] Recognition in context: Implications for trade mark law
    Humphreys, Michael S.
    McFarlane, Kimberley A.
    Burt, Jennifer S.
    Kelly, Sarah J.
    Weatherall, Kimberlee G.
    Burrell, Robert G.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (05) : 1665 - 1672
  • [37] The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law
    McDonagh, Luke
    QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2020, 10 (04) : 514 - 515
  • [38] SUPPLEMENT TO A COMPENDIUM OF TRADE MARK LAW AND PRACTICE
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1933, 15 (03): : 224 - 224
  • [39] The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law
    Torremans, Paul
    MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2020, 83 (05): : 1128 - 1131
  • [40] The Meaning of Distinctiveness in Trade-mark Law
    Martin, Charles
    ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1950, 45 (05): : 535 - 582