Screening for ovarian cancer in the general population

被引:30
|
作者
Chu, CS [1 ]
Rubin, SC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
CA-125; ovarian cancer; population surveillance; proteomics; screening; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.10.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Screening for ovarian cancer in the general population presents several unique challenges. Without a clearly identified premalignant state, efforts have focused on detection of early stage disease. Towards this end, investigators have focused on the use of serum markers and transvaginal ultrasound. CA125 determination is the most reliable serum marker in use, and utilization of serial measurements to calculate risk of cancer appears to have greater utility than evaluation of a single value. Multimodality screening focuses on combining serial CA125 measurement with transvaginal ultrasound follow-up for those with abnormal values. Large prospective trials, such as the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), are currently underway to assess the impact of various screening strategies on mortality, and to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and morbidity of screening. Future research efforts will undoubtedly focus on promising techniques to examine the serum proteosome for patterns to identify early ovarian cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 320
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Family history of cancer and cancer screening utilization in the general US population
    Hall, IJ
    Freedman, AN
    Wideroff, L
    Coughlin, SS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (11) : S91 - S91
  • [22] A comparison of ovarian cancer treatments: analysis of utility assessments of ovarian cancer patients, at-risk population, general population, and physicians
    Calhoun, EA
    Fishman, DA
    Lurain, JR
    Welshman, EE
    Bennett, CL
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 93 (01) : 164 - 169
  • [23] A TIME SERIES ALGORITHM DOUBLES SENSITIVITY OF POPULATION SCREENING FOR OVARIAN CANCER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM COLLABORATIVE TRIAL OF OVARIAN CANCER SCREENING (UKCTOCS)
    Menon, U.
    Ryan, A.
    Kalsi, J.
    Gentry-Maharaj, A.
    Dawnay, A.
    Habib, M.
    Apostolidou, S.
    Singh, N.
    Benjamin, E.
    Burnell, M.
    Davies, S.
    Sharma, A.
    Gunu, R.
    Godfrey, K.
    Lopes, A.
    Oram, D.
    Herod, J.
    Williamson, K.
    Seif, M.
    Jenkins, H.
    Mould, T.
    Woolas, R.
    Murdoch, J.
    Dobbs, S.
    Nazar, N.
    Leeson, S.
    Cruickshank, D.
    Scott, I
    Fallowfield, L.
    Widschwendter, M.
    Reynolds, K.
    Campbell, S.
    Parmar, M.
    Skates, S. J.
    Jacobs, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 1587 - 1588
  • [24] Subtypes of Ovarian Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Screening
    Koshiyama, Masafumi
    Matsumura, Noriomi
    Konishi, Ikuo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [25] Initial experience with a general population colorectal cancer screening clinic
    Brosseuk, Daniel
    Oosthuizen, Jean
    Pinchbeck, Melanie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 191 (05): : 669 - 672
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
    Launoy, G
    Berchi, C
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 49 (01): : 102 - 103
  • [27] Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey
    J Waller
    K Osborne
    J Wardle
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 562 - 566
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
    Frazier, AL
    Colditz, GA
    Fuchs, CS
    Kuntz, KM
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (15): : 1954 - 1961
  • [29] Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey
    Waller, J.
    Osborne, K.
    Wardle, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (03) : 562 - 566
  • [30] Screening strategies for sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population
    Pox, C
    Schulmann, K
    Schmiegel, W
    EXOGENOUS FACTORS IN COLONIC CARCINOGENESIS, 2003, 128 : 101 - 109