Marine ecotoxic effect of pulse emissions in life cycle impact assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Pettersen, J [1 ]
Peters, GP
Hertwich, EG
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Programme, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
ecotoxicity; fate; life cycle impact assessment; pulse; transient;
D O I
10.1897/04-510R.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Characterization factors for ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment are traditionally calculated as the product of effect and fate factors. Steady-state multiple compartment models are used to calculate the fate factor, while effect factors are derived from species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for multiple substances using average or marginal gradients. Others have shown that steady-state multicompartment models can be used to calculate characterization factors if linear dose-response functions are used. Average gradients are linear dose-response functions per definition. Marginal gradients are first-order Taylor approximations of the effect function and require marginal exposure at all points of the compartment. Instantaneous mixing, giving marginal exposure within compartments, is an implicit assumption of the multicompartment model. This paper investigates if the assumption of marginal exposure results in significant errors for the characterization factor. Ecotoxic effect of pulse emissions is simulated in a transient three-dimensional single compartment model of the marine aquatic environment. Results show that the error in characterization factors for the Taylor approximation is less than a factor of two for multisubstance SSDs assuming concentration addition only in the aggregation of toxic effect of substances. Assuming a combination of response and concentration addition may result in a deviation of several orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Marine biodiversity impact pathways for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Implications for Life Cycle impact assessment development
    Stranddorf, Liv
    Colley, Tracey
    Delefosse, Matthieu
    Svendsen, Jon C.
    Olsen, Stig Irving
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 167
  • [32] Environmental Impact Assessment of Anti-Corrosion Coating Life Cycle Processes for Marine Applications
    Borgaonkar, Avinash
    McNamara, Greg
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [33] Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment
    Tukker, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2000, 20 (04) : 435 - 456
  • [34] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of an innovative energy cycle with zero CO2 emissions
    Fiaschi, D
    Lombardi, L
    Manfrida, G
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 911 - 916
  • [35] Considering Grouped or Individual Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compound Emissions in Life Cycle Assessment of Composting Using Three Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods
    Joseph, Ben
    Stichnothe, Heinz
    RECYCLING, 2024, 9 (03)
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment of Noise Emissions: Comment on a Recent Publication
    Reinout Heijungs
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2017, 22 : 183 - 184
  • [37] A bright future for addressing chemical emissions in life cycle assessment
    Michael Z. Hauschild
    Olivier Jolliet
    Mark A. J. Huijbregts
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 697 - 700
  • [38] Emissions life cycle assessment of diesel, hybrid and electric buses
    Zhao, Enoch
    Walker, Paul D.
    Surawski, Nic C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2022, 236 (06) : 1233 - 1245
  • [39] Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry
    Moresi, Mauro
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2014, 25 (03): : 53 - 62
  • [40] Emissions life cycle assessment of charging infrastructures for electric buses
    Zhao, Enoch
    May, Ethan
    Walker, Paul D.
    Surawski, Nic C.
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 48