Application of Visual and Instrument Flight Rules to Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems A conceptual approach

被引:0
|
作者
Finke, Michael [1 ]
Sinapius, Philipp B. [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Flight Guidance, Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
RPAS; remotely piloted aircraft systems; unmanned aircraft systems; non-segrated; visual flight rules; instrument flight rules; see and avoid; detect and avoid;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The non-segregated participation of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) into civil air traffic is still a big challenge with many open questions, especially in terms of airspace integration, traffic handling and aircraft certification. One of the most basic and most natural regulatory requirements in aviation is the application of flight rules as written down in ICAO Annex II. This existing regulation is on one hand per definition not restricted to manned aviation, on the other hand it points to the need of finding a way to apply these flight rules also to RPAS, which has already been a known key issue for a long period of time, but which is not yet completely solved by now. Many ANSPs impose only few requirements for RPAS operations under instrument flight rules, but the application of visual flight rules to RPAS operations is more demanding, e.g. in terms of detect-and-avoid capabilities, navigation, right-of-way, aerodrome operations and others. Many of the worldwide research activities related to RPAS set the focus on developing technical solutions to reproduce these pilot-typical capabilities such as the see & avoid capability, and it should be just a question of time, until such a sensor-based technology will be available. But the introduction of these devices will most probably imply a significant change in terms of navigation, perception of the aircraft environment and decision making compared to manned aviation. The question how to apply visual and instrument flight rules to RPAS will still not be completely answered. Starting from ICAO's Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (ICAO Doc 10019), this paper looks beyond required technical capabilities and gives a renewed definition of flight rules. This definition is especially designed for both manned and unmanned aviation without significantly changing or lowering the standards for manned aviation. Based on several conceptual studies, which were performed within the scope of the DLR research activities for traffic management and integration of unmanned aircraft, this paper provides a simple guideline for the application of these re-defined - or modernized - flight rules in analogy to the existing rules. It discusses manned and unmanned flight operations in non-segregated and segregated airspace as well as unmanned visual-line-of-sight operations in terms of navigation, surveillance, tactical ATM decision making and flight pre-notification, following existing procedures as far as possible. The basic ideas behind these procedures are outlined, but separately from aspects resulting from distinct technical solutions (such as secondary radar and transponders) or human factors (such as visibility minima) in order to cover the whole bandwidth of manned and unmanned flight operations. In this context, basic terms are also redefined.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Remotely piloted aircraft systems and forests: a global state of the art and future challenges
    Eugenio, Fernando Coelho
    Schons, Cristine Tagliapietra
    Mallmann, Caroline Lorenci
    Schuh, Mateus Sabadi
    Fernandes, Pablo
    Badin, Tiago Luis
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2020, 50 (08) : 705 - 716
  • [32] Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems as a Rhinoceros Anti-Poaching Tool in Africa
    Mulero-Pazmany, Margarita
    Stolper, Roel
    van Essen, L. D.
    Negro, Juan J.
    Sassen, Tyrell
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [33] The Evolution of Human-Autonomy Teams in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Operations
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2019, 4
  • [34] Evaluation and use of remotely piloted aircraft systems for operations and research - RxCADRE 2012
    Zajkowski, Thomas J.
    Dickinson, Matthew B.
    Hiers, J. Kevin
    Holley, William
    Williams, Brett W.
    Paxton, Alexander
    Martinez, Otto
    Walker, Gregory W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2016, 25 (01) : 114 - 128
  • [35] The processing of personal information using remotely piloted aircraft systems in South Africa
    Mashinini, Nomalanga
    DE JURE, 2020, 53 : 140 - 158
  • [36] Application of remotely piloted aircraft systems in observing the atmospheric boundary layer over Antarctic sea ice in winter
    Jonassen, Marius O.
    Tisler, Priit
    Altstaedter, Barbara
    Scholtz, Andreas
    Vihma, Timo
    Lampert, Astrid
    Koenig-Langlo, Gert
    Luepkes, Christof
    POLAR RESEARCH, 2015, 34
  • [37] Remotely piloted aircraft system flight-plan processing from a risk-based methodology
    Perez-Castan, Javier A.
    Gomez Comendador, V. Fernando
    Arnaldo Valdes, Rosa M.
    Rodriguez-Sanz, Alvaro
    Rey, Cristina Altemir
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2023, 237 (06) : 1390 - 1402
  • [38] Environmental guidelines for operation of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS): Experience from Antarctica
    Harris, Cohn M.
    Herata, Heike
    Hertel, Fritz
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 236 : 521 - 531
  • [39] A cognitive agent aboard remotely piloted aircraft systems: Development, evaluation, and certification issues
    Wohler, Marcus
    Schulte, Axel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 230 (09) : 1694 - 1704
  • [40] Adoption of a Bayesian Belief Network for the System Safety Assessment of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
    Washington, Achim
    Clothier, Reece
    Neogi, Natasha
    Silva, Jose
    Hayhurst, Kelly
    Williams, Brendan
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 118 : 654 - 673