Application of Visual and Instrument Flight Rules to Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems A conceptual approach

被引:0
|
作者
Finke, Michael [1 ]
Sinapius, Philipp B. [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Flight Guidance, Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
RPAS; remotely piloted aircraft systems; unmanned aircraft systems; non-segrated; visual flight rules; instrument flight rules; see and avoid; detect and avoid;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The non-segregated participation of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) into civil air traffic is still a big challenge with many open questions, especially in terms of airspace integration, traffic handling and aircraft certification. One of the most basic and most natural regulatory requirements in aviation is the application of flight rules as written down in ICAO Annex II. This existing regulation is on one hand per definition not restricted to manned aviation, on the other hand it points to the need of finding a way to apply these flight rules also to RPAS, which has already been a known key issue for a long period of time, but which is not yet completely solved by now. Many ANSPs impose only few requirements for RPAS operations under instrument flight rules, but the application of visual flight rules to RPAS operations is more demanding, e.g. in terms of detect-and-avoid capabilities, navigation, right-of-way, aerodrome operations and others. Many of the worldwide research activities related to RPAS set the focus on developing technical solutions to reproduce these pilot-typical capabilities such as the see & avoid capability, and it should be just a question of time, until such a sensor-based technology will be available. But the introduction of these devices will most probably imply a significant change in terms of navigation, perception of the aircraft environment and decision making compared to manned aviation. The question how to apply visual and instrument flight rules to RPAS will still not be completely answered. Starting from ICAO's Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (ICAO Doc 10019), this paper looks beyond required technical capabilities and gives a renewed definition of flight rules. This definition is especially designed for both manned and unmanned aviation without significantly changing or lowering the standards for manned aviation. Based on several conceptual studies, which were performed within the scope of the DLR research activities for traffic management and integration of unmanned aircraft, this paper provides a simple guideline for the application of these re-defined - or modernized - flight rules in analogy to the existing rules. It discusses manned and unmanned flight operations in non-segregated and segregated airspace as well as unmanned visual-line-of-sight operations in terms of navigation, surveillance, tactical ATM decision making and flight pre-notification, following existing procedures as far as possible. The basic ideas behind these procedures are outlined, but separately from aspects resulting from distinct technical solutions (such as secondary radar and transponders) or human factors (such as visibility minima) in order to cover the whole bandwidth of manned and unmanned flight operations. In this context, basic terms are also redefined.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flight Optimization for Remotely Piloted Aircraft
    Glizde, N.
    Urbaha, M.
    TRANSPORT MEANS 2018, PTS I-III, 2018, : 1179 - 1184
  • [2] Autodiagnositcs for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
    Zokowski, Mariusz
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS, MSM'20, 2020, : 195 - 198
  • [3] Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems conceptual design methodology based on factor analysis
    Gomez-Rodriguez, Alvaro
    Sanchez-Carmona, Alejandro
    Garcia-Hernandez, Luis
    Cuerno-Rejado, Cristina
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 90 : 368 - 387
  • [4] Specialist for Geospatial Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
    不详
    GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2013, 27 (08): : 38 - 40
  • [5] Visual Display Angles of Conventional and a Remotely Piloted Aircraft
    Kamine, Tovy Haber
    Bendrick, Gregg A.
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 80 (04): : 409 - 413
  • [6] Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
    Eqbal, Mithun Abdul Sathar
    Fernando, Nuwantha
    Marino, Matthew
    Wild, Graham
    AEROSPACE, 2018, 5 (02)
  • [7] Conceptual design studies of vertical takeoff and landing remotely piloted aircraft systems for hybrid missions
    Herbst S.
    Wortmann G.
    Hornung M.
    CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 7 (1) : 135 - 148
  • [8] Conceptual optimization of remotely piloted amphibious aircraft for wildfire air attack
    Ward, Ryan
    Readman, Brett
    O'Yeung, Brennan
    Hinman, W. Schuyler
    DRONE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 11 : 1 - 38
  • [9] Remotely piloted aircraft systems: the introduction of the ‘flying watchtower’
    Sophy Antrobus
    Digital War, 2024, 5 (1-2): : 141 - 145
  • [10] Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems: Some Unexplored Issues
    Abeyratne, Ruwantissa
    AIR & SPACE LAW, 2016, 41 (03): : 289 - 303