Analysis error covariance versus posterior covariance in variational data assimilation

被引:25
|
作者
Gejadze, I. Yu. [1 ]
Shutyaev, V. [2 ]
Le Dimet, F. -X. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Civil Engn, Glasgow G4 ONG, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Numer Math, MIPT, Moscow, Russia
[3] Univ Grenoble, MOISE Project, LJK, Grenoble, France
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
large-scale flow models; nonlinear dynamics; data assimilation; optimal control; analysis error covariance; Bayesian posterior covariance; Hessian; LIMITED MEMORY BFGS; IMPLEMENTATION; MODELS; FILTER;
D O I
10.1002/qj.2070
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The problem of variational data assimilation for a nonlinear evolution model is formulated as an optimal control problem to find the initial condition function (analysis). The data contain errors (observation and background errors); hence there is an error in the analysis. For mildly nonlinear dynamics the analysis error covariance can be approximated by the inverse Hessian of the cost functional in the auxiliary data assimilation problem, and for stronger nonlinearity by the effective' inverse Hessian. However, it has been noticed that the analysis error covariance is not the posterior covariance from the Bayesian perspective. While these two are equivalent in the linear case, the difference may become significant in practical terms with the nonlinearity level rising. For the proper Bayesian posterior covariance a new approximation via the Hessian is derived and its effective' counterpart is introduced. An approach for computing the mentioned estimates in the matrix-free environment using the Lanczos method with preconditioning is suggested. Numerical examples which validate the developed theory are presented for the model governed by Burgers equation with a nonlinear viscous term.
引用
收藏
页码:1826 / 1841
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ocean data assimilation with background error covariance derived from OGCM outputs
    Fu, WW
    Zhou, GQ
    Wang, HJ
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2004, 21 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [32] Background error covariance iterative updating with invariant observation measures for data assimilation
    Sibo Cheng
    Jean-Philippe Argaud
    Bertrand Iooss
    Didier Lucor
    Angélique Ponçot
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33 : 2033 - 2051
  • [33] Adjoint sensitivity of the model forecast to data assimilation system error covariance parameters
    Daescu, Dacian N.
    Todling, Ricardo
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 136 (653) : 2000 - 2012
  • [34] Structure of forecast error covariance in coupled atmosphere-chemistry data assimilation
    Park, S. K.
    Lim, S.
    Zupanski, M.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (05) : 1315 - 1320
  • [35] An adaptive estimation of forecast error covariance parameters for Kalman filtering data assimilation
    Xiaogu Zheng
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 26 : 154 - 160
  • [36] Background error covariance estimation for atmospheric CO2 data assimilation
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Engelen, Richard J.
    Kawa, Stephan R.
    Sweeney, Colm
    Michalak, Anna M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (17) : 10140 - 10154
  • [37] Background error covariance iterative updating with invariant observation measures for data assimilation
    Cheng, Sibo
    Argaud, Jean-Philippe
    Iooss, Bertrand
    Lucor, Didier
    Poncot, Angelique
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2019, 33 (11-12) : 2033 - 2051
  • [38] Ocean data assimilation with background error covariance derived from OGCM outputs
    Weiwei Fu
    Guangqing Zhou
    Huijun Wang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2004, 21 : 181 - 192
  • [39] An Adaptive Estimation of Forecast Error Covariance Parameters for Kalman Filtering Data Assimilation
    Zheng, Xiaogu
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2009, 26 (01) : 154 - 160
  • [40] On deterministic error analysis in variational data assimilation
    Le Dimet, FX
    Shutyaev, V
    NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2005, 12 (04) : 481 - 490