Automated Classification of Urban Areas for Storm Water Management Using Aerial Photography and LiDAR

被引:4
|
作者
Talebi, Leila [1 ]
Kuczynski, Anika [1 ]
Graettinger, Andrew J. [1 ]
Pitt, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Inst Environm, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Urban classification; Storm water; Light detection and ranging (LiDAR); Arc geographic information system (ArcGIS ModelBuilder); Image processing; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ESTIMATION; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; BUILDINGS; ACCURACY; IMAGERY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000815
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
During urbanization, undisturbed land surfaces are altered to create manufactured landscapes. Classifications of these new urban surfaces are utilized in urban planning, environmental monitoring, and other applications such as storm water management and roof runoff harvesting system design. To evaluate runoff volume and design storm water control devices, areas of different urban surfaces need to be identified and defined as pervious (e.g.,undisturbed soils and landscaped areas) and impervious surfaces (e.g.,roofs, roads, parking lots, sidewalks, driveways). This study presents a means to facilitate urban surface classification and quantification by analyzing high resolution aerial photographs in conjunction with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data in a custom application for the geographic information system software. This software processes aerial photographs using red/green/blue (RGB) bands to produce a raster with saturation (S) values. In parallel, LiDAR data are used to distinguish the major surface categories of pavement from roofs and pervious surfaces, and topologically integrated geographic encoding and referencing (TIGER) centerlines are used to identify streets. This process was tested for two different land uses: institutional (University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama) and residential (also located in Tuscaloosa, Alabama). Compared to manually delineated areas, the urban area classification differences ranged from 0.2 to 5.2% for roofs, streets, parking lots, and pervious areas. The efficiency of the process compared to the manual delineation of surface areas resulted in time and effort savings ranging from 80 to 90% depending on the size of the area processed. Manual verification by field observations of other characteristics, such as the curb-side drainage system type, still needs to be performed regardless of the surface characterization method employed. Determining the basic area measurements greatly accelerates this initial phase into a comprehensive storm water management planning effort.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 895
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Full-Waveform Lidar Data for Classification of Urban Areas
    Mallet, Clement
    Bretar, Frederic
    Soergel, Uwe
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2008, (05): : 337 - 349
  • [32] Contextual classification of lidar data and building object detection in urban areas
    Niemeyer, Joachim
    Rottensteiner, Franz
    Soergel, Uwe
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 87 : 152 - 165
  • [33] Classification and Extraction of Trees and Buildings from Urban Scenes Using Discrete Return LiDAR and Aerial Color Imagery
    Bandyopadhyay, Madhurima
    van Aardt, Jan A. N.
    Cawse-Nicholson, Kerry
    LASER RADAR TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS XVIII, 2013, 8731
  • [34] LARGE-SCALE WATER CLASSIFICATION OF COASTAL AREAS USING AIRBORNE TOPOGRAPHIC LIDAR DATA
    Smeeckaert, Julien
    Mallet, Clement
    David, Nicolas
    Chehata, Nesrine
    Ferraz, Antonio
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 61 - 64
  • [35] WATER MANAGEMENT IN EARLY CAMBODIA - EVIDENCE FROM AERIAL-PHOTOGRAPHY
    MOORE, E
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 155 : 204 - 214
  • [36] Classification of willow species using large-scale aerial photography
    Petersen, SL
    Stringham, TK
    Laliberte, AS
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 58 (06) : 582 - 587
  • [37] USES OF SMALL FORMAT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.
    Kinsey, R.H.
    Proceedings - Micro-Delcon, 1980, : 63 - 68
  • [38] URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT - DISTRIBUTION OF FLOOD VOLUMES
    CHAN, SO
    BRAS, RL
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1979, 15 (02) : 371 - 382
  • [39] Toward the sustainable management of urban storm-water
    Chocat, B.
    Ashley, R.
    Marsalek, J.
    Matos, M. R.
    Rauch, W.
    Schilling, W.
    Urbonas, B.
    INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 16 (03) : 273 - 285
  • [40] Application of Storm Water Management Model to an Urban Catchment
    Swathi, V.
    Raju, K. Srinivasa
    Singh, Ajit Pratap
    HYDROLOGIC MODELING, 2018, 81 : 175 - 184