Degree of Internet corporate reporting: a research framework

被引:0
|
作者
Poon, Pak-Lok [1 ]
Yu, Yuen Tak [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Accounting & Finance, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Comp Sci, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
WEB SITES; DIFFUSION; ADOPTION; DESIGN; MODEL; INNOVATIONS; PERCEPTIONS; INTEGRATION; STRATEGIES; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction. This paper is concerned with the extent to which Internet corporate reporting has been practiced by firms which use this innovation, and whether it is related to certain characteristics of these firms. Method. We surveyed a number of theories on technology innovation/adoption, and applied them to hypothesise the relationships between several characteristics of corporate firms and their degrees of Internet corporate reporting. Analysis. Grounded on the diffusion of innovation theory, expectation-confirmation theory, corporate governance theories and learning/experience curve theories, we conjectured that the degree of adopting Internet corporate reporting is related to the firm's corporate governance, system openness, size, revenue, stock trading activity and experience of adoption. Results. A generic framework is developed to study the degree of Internet corporate reporting in corporate Websites. Together with the research questions and hypotheses presented in this paper, our work forms the essential theoretical basis on which empirical studies can be performed. Conclusions. Our research framework and its associated research questions/hypotheses are generic and, hence, are useful to researchers for follow-up theoretical or empirical studies on the adoption of Internet corporate reporting in a variety of contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate governance research: a contingency framework
    Dedman, Elisabeth
    Filatotchev, Igor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2008, 4 (04) : 248 - +
  • [32] An improved deep learning algorithm for risk prediction of corporate internet reporting
    Ou L.
    Chen L.
    Ou, Lingyan (oly013@fjjxu.edu.cn), 1600, International Information and Engineering Technology Association (34): : 437 - 444
  • [33] The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and internet financial reporting in Iran
    Zadeh, Farzaneh Nassir
    Salehi, Mahdi
    Shabestari, Haneyeh
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2018, 18 (06): : 1021 - 1041
  • [34] Evaluating Corporate Environmental Reporting on the Internet The Utility and Resource Industries in Spain
    Rodriguez Bolivar, Manuel Pedro
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2009, 48 (02) : 179 - 205
  • [35] A Holistic Framework to Enhance Sustainable Development and Reporting in Corporate Sustainability
    Bilancia, Alessia
    Costa, Federica
    Staudacher, Alberto Portioli
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS-PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR VOLATILE, UNCERTAIN, COMPLEX, AND AMBIGUOUS ENVIRONMENTS, APMS 2024, PT I, 2024, 728 : 338 - 351
  • [36] Corporate reporting on the Internet and the expectations gap: new face of an old problem
    Fisher, Richard T.
    Naylor, Samuel T.
    ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 46 (02) : 196 - 220
  • [37] Research on Internet Economy and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Yao Qian
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - FEMALE SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, : 390 - 395
  • [38] Non-financial reporting and corporate governance: a conceptual framework
    Dimes, Ruth
    Molinari, Matteo
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (05) : 1067 - 1093
  • [39] A Conceptual Framework for Investigating ‘Capture’ in Corporate Sustainability Reporting Assurance
    John Smith
    Ros Haniffa
    Jenny Fairbrass
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 99 : 425 - 439
  • [40] A Conceptual Framework for Investigating 'Capture' in Corporate Sustainability Reporting Assurance
    Smith, John
    Haniffa, Ros
    Fairbrass, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 99 (03) : 425 - 439