Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network

被引:85
|
作者
Geubbels, ELPE
Nagelkerke, NJD
Mintjes-De Groot, AJ
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE
Grobbee, DE
De Boer, AS
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, PREZIES, Ctr Infect Dis Epidemiol, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol,RIVM, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, RIVM, Dept Computerizat & Methodol Consultancy, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Inst Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Gen Practice & Patient Oriented Res, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
health care quality; prevention; surgical wound infection; surveillance;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzi103
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To estimate the effect of multicentre surveillance for nosocomial infections on patients' risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Design. Prospective multi-centre cohort study, from January 1996 to December 2000. Setting. Acute care hospitals in The Netherlands. Study participants. All 50 hospitals performing surveillance for one of seven selected procedures in the Dutch surveillance network for nosocomial infections PREZIES were invited. Thirty-seven hospitals participated (74%) and provided information on 21920 operations, after which 885 (4%) SSI occurred. Interventions. The surveillance comprised the following: Development of surveillance methodology by multidisciplinary team; use of a standardized registration protocol and software; regular training of data collectors; anonymous inter-hospital comparison of infection rates and feedback of results; appointment of one contact person per hospital, responsible for data collection; and dissemination of results to other health care professionals. Regular discussion of both successful and failing prevention strategies that had been instituted based on the surveillance results. Outcome measure. Risk of SSI. Results. The risk of infection was reduced for patients who had an operation during the fourth surveillance year (RR = 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-0.89) and decreased further for patients operated on during the fifth surveillance year (RR = 0.43; CI = 0.24-0.76) as compared with patients who underwent surgery within one year of the start of surveillance in their hospital. No significant risk reduction was observed for patients operated on during the second and third surveillance years. Conclusion. Surveillance, supported by participation in a surveillance network, reduced the risk of SSI in surgical patients registered in the Dutch surveillance network PREZIES. Our results suggest that infection control teams need to be perseverant and that surveillance programmes should be given time before evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges in reporting surgical site infections to the national surgical site infection surveillance and suggestions for improvement
    Singh, S.
    Davies, J.
    Sabou, S.
    Shrivastava, R.
    Reddy, S.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2015, 97 (06) : 460 - 465
  • [22] Performance of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index in predicting surgical site infection in Australia
    Friedman, N. Deborah
    Bull, Ann L.
    Russo, Philip L.
    Gurrin, Lyle
    Richards, Michael
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (01): : 55 - 59
  • [23] Prospective Nationwide Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections after Gastric Surgery and Risk Factor Analysis in the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS)
    Kim, Eu Suk
    Kim, Hong Bin
    Song, Kyoung-Ho
    Kim, Young Keun
    Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Jin, Hye Young
    Jeong, Sun Young
    Sung, Joohon
    Cho, Yong Kyun
    Lee, Yeong-Seon
    Oh, Hee-Bok
    Kim, Eui-Chong
    Kim, June Myung
    Choi, Tae Yeol
    Choi, Hee Jung
    Kim, Hyo Youl
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (06): : 572 - 580
  • [24] Risk stratification for surgical site infections in Australia: evaluation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index
    Clements, A. C. A.
    Tong, E. N. C.
    Morton, A. P.
    Whitby, M.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 66 (02) : 148 - 155
  • [25] Using the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index to determine risk factors associated with surgical site infections following gynecologic surgeries
    Wang, Dong
    Wu, Jinlin
    Deng, Jianjun
    Luo, Ming
    Ruan, Jie
    Yang, Zhan
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2025, 96 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [26] POSTDISCHARGE SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS - SURVEILLANCE BY PATIENT AND SURGEON QUESTIONNAIRES
    SANDS, K
    VINEYARD, G
    PLATT, R
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (02): : A235 - A235
  • [27] Surveillance of surgical site infections. What is the best way?
    Pujol Rojo, Miquel
    Shaw Perujo, Evelyn
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2014, 32 (08): : 477 - 478
  • [28] Surveillance of surgical site infections after open heart surgery
    Loss, R.
    Marggraf, G.
    Jakob, H.
    Piotrowski, A.
    Ross, B.
    Hansen, D.
    Popp, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 301 : 34 - 34
  • [29] The surveillance of surgical site infections after modified radical mastectomy
    Turanli, S.
    Aslan, S.
    Cetin, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : S117 - S117
  • [30] Evaluation of surveillance for surgical site infections in Thika Hospital, Kenya
    Aiken, A. M.
    Wanyoro, A. K.
    Mwangi, J.
    Mulingwa, P.
    Wanjohi, J.
    Njoroge, J.
    Juma, F.
    Mugoya, I. K.
    Scott, J. A. G.
    Hall, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2013, 83 (02) : 140 - 145