Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Cash, J. Christian [1 ]
Zehetner, Joerg [1 ]
Hedayati, Bobak [1 ]
Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A. [1 ]
Katkhouda, Namir [1 ]
Mason, Rodney J. [1 ]
Lipham, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy; Minimally invasive; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; DISTAL ESOPHAGUS; EN-BLOC; GASTRIC MOBILIZATION; LYMPH-NODES; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; ADENOCARCINOMA; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3230-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Most published minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques involve a multiple field approach, including laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) should potentially reduce the complications associated with thoracotomy. This study aims to compare outcomes of LTE with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) and en-bloc esophagectomy (EBE). Methods Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who had an LTE for cancer between July 2008 and July 2012 at our institution. Data was compared with an historic cohort of patients who underwent OTE and EBE at the same institution from July 2002 to July 2008. Results There were 33 patients with LTE, compared with 60 patients with OTE and 139 with EBE. The presence of minor operative complications was similar (p = 0.36), but major complications were significantly less common in the LTE group (12, 23 and 33 %, respectively; p = 0.04). The median number of blood transfusions during hospitalization was significantly lower in the LTE group (0, 2.5 and 3, respectively; p = 0.005). Median tumor size was significantly smaller (1.5, 2.2, and 3 cm, respectively; p = 0.03), but the LTE group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with neoadjuvant treatment (39, 14 and 29 %, respectively; p = 0.008). Median lymph node yield for LTE was lower (24, 36 and 48, respectively; p < 0.0001), but the percentage of patients with positive nodes was similar (33, 33 and 39 %, respectively; p = 0.69). Mortality was equivalent among the groups (0, 2 and 4 %, respectively; p = 0.38). The median LOS for the LTE group was significantly lower (10, 13 and 15 days, respectively; p < 0.0001). Overall survival was not different between the three groups (p = 0.65), with median survival at 24 months of 70, 65 and 65 %, respectively. Conclusion LTE can be performed safely with less major complications and shorter hospital stay than open esophagectomy. The reduced lymph-node harvest did not impact overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of laparoscopic assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
    Chambers, K.
    Montenovo, M. I.
    Pellegrini, C. A.
    Oelschlager, B. K.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 56 (01) : 244 - 244
  • [32] Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Tangoku, A
    Yoshino, S
    Abe, T
    Hayashi, H
    Satou, T
    Ueno, T
    Oka, M
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (03): : 383 - 389
  • [33] STRIPPING VERSUS CLASSIC TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    Alibakhshi, A.
    Elyasi, F.
    Robati, A.
    Jahangiri, Y.
    Kiamusavi, M.
    Aminian, A.
    Afshin, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 83 - 83
  • [34] Esophageal Mythology: Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    Badruddoja, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (03) : 481 - 482
  • [35] Long-Term Quality of Life Following Transthoracic and Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    E. Jezerskyte
    L. M. Saadeh
    E. R. C. Hagens
    M. A. G. Sprangers
    L. Noteboom
    H. W. M. van Laarhoven
    W. J. Eshuis
    M. C. C. M. Hulshof
    M. I. van Berge Henegouwen
    S. S. Gisbertz
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1657 - 1666
  • [36] Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    A. Tangoku
    S. Yoshino
    T. Abe
    H. Hayashi
    T. Satou
    T. Ueno
    M. Oka
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 383 - 389
  • [37] Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal SCC: outcomes and complications
    Ehsan Soltani
    Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh
    Azadeh Jabbari Nooghabi
    Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi
    Khosrow Ravankhah Moghaddam
    Ehsan Hassanzadeh Haddad
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [38] Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer
    Morgan, M. A.
    Lewis, W. G.
    Hopper, A. N.
    Escofet, X.
    Havard, T. J.
    Brewster, A. E.
    Crosby, T. D. L.
    Roberts, S. A.
    Clark, G. W. B.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2007, 20 (03): : 225 - 231
  • [39] Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma
    Yu, Lei
    Wu, Ji-xiang
    Gao, Yu-shun
    Li, Jian-ye
    Zhang, Yun-feng
    Ke, Ji
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06): : 2382 - 2389
  • [40] Long-Term Quality of Life Following Transthoracic and Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Jezerskyte, E.
    Saadeh, L. M.
    Hagens, E. R. C.
    Sprangers, M. A. G.
    Noteboom, L.
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    Eshuis, W. J.
    Hulshof, M. C. C. M.
    van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
    Gisbertz, S. S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (07) : 1657 - 1666