Inter-Physician Variation in Follow-Up Colonoscopies after Screening Colonoscopy

被引:13
|
作者
Stock, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmeister, Michael [1 ]
Birkner, Berndt [3 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Bavarian Assoc Statutory Hlth Insurance Phys, Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINES; POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMAS; UPDATE; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0069312
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Surveillance is an integral part of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process. We aimed to investigate inter-physician variation in follow-up procedures after screening colonoscopy in an opportunistic CRC screening program. Methods: A historical cohort study in the German statutory health insurance system was conducted. 55,301 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy in 2006 in Bavaria, Germany, and who were not diagnosed with CRC were included. Utilization of follow-up colonoscopies performed by the same physician (328 physicians overall) within 3 years was ascertained. Mixed effects logistic regression modelling was used to assess the effect of physicians and other potential predictors (screening result, age group, and sex) on re-utilization of colonoscopy. Physicians were grouped into quintiles according to individual effects estimated in a preliminary model. Predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy by screening result and physician group were calculated. Results: The observed rate of follow-up colonoscopy was 6.2% (95% confidence interval: 5.9-6.4%), 18.6% (17.8-19.4%), and 37.0% (35.5-38.4%) after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. All considered predictors were statistically significantly associated with follow-up colonoscopy. The predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy ranged from 1.7% (1.4-2.0%) to 11.0% (10.2-11.7%), from 7.3% (6.2-8.5%) to 35.1% (32.6-37.7%), and from 17.9% (15.5-20.6%) to 56.9% (53.5-60.3%) in the 1st quintile (lowest rates of follow-up) and 5th quintile (highest rates of follow-up) of physicians after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. Conclusions: This study suggests substantial inter-physician variation in follow-up habits after screening colonoscopy. Interventions, including organizational changes in CRC screening should be considered to reduce this variation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is there a role for routine colonoscopy in the follow-up after acute appendicitis?
    Pedersen, Eirik Sylthe
    Stornes, Tore
    Rekstad, Lars Cato
    Martinsen, Tom Christian
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (08) : 1008 - 1012
  • [22] The role of colonoscopy in follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery
    De Salvo, L
    Bruzzone, D
    Priora, F
    Gianiorio, F
    Rossi, E
    Arboscello, E
    Bogliolo, G
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 : 67 - 67
  • [23] Impact of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality on Follow-up Interval Recommendations for Average-risk Patients With Normal Screening Colonoscopies Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
    Butterly, Lynn F.
    Nadel, Marion R.
    Anderson, Joseph C.
    Robinson, Christina M.
    Weiss, Julia E.
    Lieberman, David
    Shapiro, Jean A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 54 (04) : 356 - 364
  • [24] RATES OF FOLLOW-UP COLONOSCOPY AFTER POSITIVE STOOL-BASED SCREENING TEST FOR COLORECTAL CANCER
    Stockl, K.
    Decker, M.
    Hang, L.
    Goodman, B.
    Dacosta, Byfield S.
    Malin, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S240 - S240
  • [25] INTERVAL CANCER AFTER NEGATIVE FOLLOW-UP COLONOSCOPY WITHIN A FIT BASED CRC SCREENING PROGRAM
    van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer, Hilliene J.
    Kooyker, Arthur I.
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    Geuzinge, H. A.
    Van Vuuren, Anneke
    Van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Ramakers, Christian
    Dekker, Evelien
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Spaander, Manon
    Van Leerdam, Monique
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S175 - S175
  • [26] COMPLIANCE OF CHOLESTEROL SCREENING PARTICIPANTS WITH DIET MODIFICATION AND PHYSICIAN FOLLOW-UP
    MCKINLEY, LJ
    CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) : 513 - 513
  • [27] THE IMPORTANCE OF FOLLOW-UP COLONOSCOPY POLYPECTOMY
    ALBERTIFLOR, JJ
    HALTER, S
    DUNN, GD
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1985, 88 (05) : 1302 - 1302
  • [28] Physician Follow-up Care for Osteoporosis After Fragility Fractures
    Giammattei, Frank
    Giammattei, Jeannette
    Howland, Vera
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04): : 69 - 74
  • [29] A global view of adherence to colonoscopy follow-up in cascade screening of colorectal cancer
    Yang, Yihui
    Huang, Junjie
    Wu, Weimiao
    Luu, Hung N.
    Moy, Foong-Ming
    Tan, Songsong
    Fu, Jiongxing
    Ying, Tao
    Withers, Mellissa
    Dang The Hung
    Mao, Dandan
    Chen, Sikun
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Xu, Wanghong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (05)
  • [30] Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
    Gloria D. Coronado
    Alexandra Kihn-Stang
    Matthew T. Slaughter
    Amanda F. Petrik
    Jamie H. Thompson
    Jennifer S. Rivelli
    Ricardo Jimenez
    Jeffrey Gibbs
    Neha Yadav
    Rajasekhara R. Mummadi
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21