Inter-Physician Variation in Follow-Up Colonoscopies after Screening Colonoscopy

被引:13
|
作者
Stock, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmeister, Michael [1 ]
Birkner, Berndt [3 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Bavarian Assoc Statutory Hlth Insurance Phys, Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINES; POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMAS; UPDATE; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0069312
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Surveillance is an integral part of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process. We aimed to investigate inter-physician variation in follow-up procedures after screening colonoscopy in an opportunistic CRC screening program. Methods: A historical cohort study in the German statutory health insurance system was conducted. 55,301 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy in 2006 in Bavaria, Germany, and who were not diagnosed with CRC were included. Utilization of follow-up colonoscopies performed by the same physician (328 physicians overall) within 3 years was ascertained. Mixed effects logistic regression modelling was used to assess the effect of physicians and other potential predictors (screening result, age group, and sex) on re-utilization of colonoscopy. Physicians were grouped into quintiles according to individual effects estimated in a preliminary model. Predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy by screening result and physician group were calculated. Results: The observed rate of follow-up colonoscopy was 6.2% (95% confidence interval: 5.9-6.4%), 18.6% (17.8-19.4%), and 37.0% (35.5-38.4%) after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. All considered predictors were statistically significantly associated with follow-up colonoscopy. The predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy ranged from 1.7% (1.4-2.0%) to 11.0% (10.2-11.7%), from 7.3% (6.2-8.5%) to 35.1% (32.6-37.7%), and from 17.9% (15.5-20.6%) to 56.9% (53.5-60.3%) in the 1st quintile (lowest rates of follow-up) and 5th quintile (highest rates of follow-up) of physicians after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. Conclusions: This study suggests substantial inter-physician variation in follow-up habits after screening colonoscopy. Interventions, including organizational changes in CRC screening should be considered to reduce this variation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utilization and determinants of follow-up colonoscopies within 6 years after screening colonoscopy: Prospective cohort study
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Holleczek, Bernd
    Stock, Christian
    Zwinkl, Nadine
    Stolz, Thomas
    Stegmaier, Christa
    Brenner, Hermann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (02) : 402 - 410
  • [2] Adverse events after screening and follow-up colonoscopy
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    Johnson, Eric
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Mandelson, Margaret T.
    Inadomi, John
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [3] Adverse events after screening and follow-up colonoscopy
    Carolyn M. Rutter
    Eric Johnson
    Diana L. Miglioretti
    Margaret T. Mandelson
    John Inadomi
    Diana S. M. Buist
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2012, 23 : 289 - 296
  • [4] FOLLOW-UP COLONOSCOPY AFTER POLYPECTOMY
    FOWLER, DL
    HEDBERG, SE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1980, 26 (02) : 67 - 67
  • [5] Inter-Physician Variation in Treatment for Patients with Crohn's Disease
    Choi, Hwang
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Lee, Kang Moon
    Lee, Bo In
    Cheung, Dae Young
    Kim, Min Kuk
    Jung, Hyun Jung
    Kim, Hyung Keun
    Ji, Jeong Seon
    Park, Soo Heon
    Chae, Hiun Suk
    Choi, Myung Gyu
    Choi, Kyu Yong
    Chung, In Sik
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2009, 7 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [6] Physician Perceptions of Surveillance Follow-up Colonoscopy in Older Adults
    Le, Stephanie T.
    Lash, Brenna R.
    Schroy, Paul C.
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (03) : 371 - 373
  • [7] Follow-up After Screening
    Dawson, Peter
    PEDIATRICS, 2016, 137 (02)
  • [8] Follow-Up Colonoscopy After a Negative Colonoscopy; Is it Followed by Guideline?
    Kim, Hyun Gun
    Jeon, Seong Ran
    Kim, Jin-Oh
    Ko, Bong Min
    Kim, Wan Jung
    Cho, Won Young
    Lee, Tae Hee
    Cho, Joo Young
    Lee, Moon Sung
    Lee, Joon Seong
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 357 - 358
  • [9] Recommendations for Follow-up Colonoscopy After Polypectomy
    Zhang, Cecelia
    Cifu, Adam S.
    Patel, Amit
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (21): : 2208 - 2209
  • [10] Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results
    Partin, Melissa R.
    Gravely, Amy A.
    Burgess, James F., Jr.
    Haggstrom, David A.
    Lillie, Sarah E.
    Nelson, David B.
    Nugent, Sean M.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Sultan, Shahnaz
    Walter, Louise C.
    Burgess, Diana J.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (18) : 3502 - 3512