The Role of Pension Business Benefits in Institutional Block Ownership and Corporate Governance

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Matsunaga, Steven R. [2 ]
Wang, Z. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
block ownership; corporate governance; institutional investor; pension; CEO CASH COMPENSATION; LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; ASYMMETRIC SENSITIVITY; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; ACTIVISM; INVESTORS; BLOCKHOLDERS; TURNOVER;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3846.12587
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether potential pension contracting benefits lead institutions that provide pension services to acquire ownership blocks in firms and the implications of such blockholdings on the firms' corporate governance. We use the 2006 Pension Protection Act, which expanded pension participation in certain states, as a quasi-exogenous shock and find an increase in block ownership by pension-providing institutions in firms with substantial operations in affected states. Further, we find that the acquisition of a large block increases the likelihood that the institution will provide future pension services to the firm. With regard to corporate governance, we find that the acquisition of large pension blockholdings is associated with higher CEO pay and lower CEO turnover following poor financial performance. However, contrary to the prediction of the private benefits hypothesis, we do not find consistent evidence that large pension blockholdings are associated with declining firm profitability, suggesting that pension institutions are incentivized to exert monitoring to preserve the investment value of their blockholdings. Overall, our evidence is consistent with pension service institutions acquiring ownership blocks to obtain pension contracts, but our evidence does not support the prediction that they use their influence to compromise shareholder value.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1989
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate governance, ownership and firm value: Drivers of ownership as a good corporate governance mechanism
    Belen Lozano, M.
    Martinez, Beatriz
    Pindado, Julio
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 25 (06) : 1333 - 1343
  • [22] The effects of institutional ownership on corporate governance and performance: An empirical assessment in Hong Kong
    Li J.
    Lam K.
    Qian G.
    Fang Y.
    Management International Review, 2006, 46 (3) : 259 - 276
  • [23] Corporate governance, institutional ownership, and stock liquidity of SMEs: evidence from China
    Liu, Wei
    Suzuki, Yoshihisa
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [24] Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance under Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance
    Sakawa, Hideaki
    Watanabel, Naoki
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [25] THE INFLUENCE OF FINANCIALIZATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
    Alvarez Peralta, Nacho
    Medialdea Garcia, Bibiana
    REVISTA DE ECONOMIA MUNDIAL, 2010, (24): : 165 - 191
  • [26] Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership
    He, Jie
    Huang, Jiekun
    Zhao, Shan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (02) : 400 - 418
  • [27] Ownership as a Form of Corporate Governance
    Connelly, Brian L.
    Hoskisson, Robert E.
    Tihanyi, Laszlo
    Certo, S. Trevis
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) : 1561 - 1589
  • [28] Institutional ownership and corporate value
    Navissi, Farshid
    Naiker, Vic
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2006, 32 (03) : 247 - 256
  • [29] Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection
    Boubakri, N
    Cosset, JC
    Guedhami, O
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 76 (02) : 369 - 399
  • [30] STATE OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    Pargendler, Mariana
    FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2012, 80 (06) : 2917 - 2973