The Role of Pension Business Benefits in Institutional Block Ownership and Corporate Governance

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Matsunaga, Steven R. [2 ]
Wang, Z. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
block ownership; corporate governance; institutional investor; pension; CEO CASH COMPENSATION; LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; ASYMMETRIC SENSITIVITY; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; ACTIVISM; INVESTORS; BLOCKHOLDERS; TURNOVER;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3846.12587
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether potential pension contracting benefits lead institutions that provide pension services to acquire ownership blocks in firms and the implications of such blockholdings on the firms' corporate governance. We use the 2006 Pension Protection Act, which expanded pension participation in certain states, as a quasi-exogenous shock and find an increase in block ownership by pension-providing institutions in firms with substantial operations in affected states. Further, we find that the acquisition of a large block increases the likelihood that the institution will provide future pension services to the firm. With regard to corporate governance, we find that the acquisition of large pension blockholdings is associated with higher CEO pay and lower CEO turnover following poor financial performance. However, contrary to the prediction of the private benefits hypothesis, we do not find consistent evidence that large pension blockholdings are associated with declining firm profitability, suggesting that pension institutions are incentivized to exert monitoring to preserve the investment value of their blockholdings. Overall, our evidence is consistent with pension service institutions acquiring ownership blocks to obtain pension contracts, but our evidence does not support the prediction that they use their influence to compromise shareholder value.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1989
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership
    Chung, Kee H.
    Zhang, Hao
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (01) : 247 - 273
  • [2] Institutional Investor Ownership and Corporate Pension Transparency
    Eaton, Tim V.
    Nofsinger, John R.
    Varma, Abhishek
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 43 (03) : 603 - 630
  • [3] Beyond Ownership: The Role of Institutional Investors in International Corporate Governance
    Drobetz, Wolfgang
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    Yu, Xinya
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2025,
  • [4] Ownership and corporate governance across institutional contexts
    Castaner, Xavier
    Goranova, Maria
    Hermes, Niels
    Kavadis, Nikolaos
    Zattoni, Alessandro
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2022, 30 (06) : 638 - 655
  • [5] Collaborative governance: The role of common institutional ownership in corporate environmental information disclosure
    Liu, Yishan
    Liu, Hu
    He, Wei
    Deng, Hanwen
    Maqsood, Umer Sahil
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [6] Corporate governance and institutional ownership: evidence from Jordan
    Al-Najjar, Basil
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 10 (02): : 176 - +
  • [7] Institutional ownership and corporate governance of public companies in China
    Guo, Lin
    Platikanov, Stefan
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 57
  • [8] The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance
    Johnson, RA
    Greening, DW
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05): : 564 - 576
  • [9] Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications
    Hadani, Michael
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2012, 65 (07) : 944 - 950
  • [10] The role of institutional ownership structures on corporate performance
    Hussain, Muzzammil
    Abid, Fareeha
    Ambreen, Syeda
    Usman, Ahmad
    Rahman, Atteeq Ur
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2022, 22 (01)