Indirect effects of habitat destruction in model ecosystems

被引:21
|
作者
Nakagiri, N [1 ]
Tanaka, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Univ, Dept Syst Engn, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4328561, Japan
关键词
indirect effects; lattice models; perturbation; habitat destruction; species extinction;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.047
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Habitat destruction is one of the primary causes of species extinction in recent history. Even if the destruction is restricted to a local area, its accumulation increases the risk of extinction. To investigate the effect of local habitat destruction, we studied two- and three-species model systems. The former contains prey (X) and predator (Y), while the latter is composed of X, Y and a top predator (Z). If the species Z goes extinct, then the latter becomes the former. Species dynamics are modeled within the lattice applying local and global interactions. Local interaction occurs between neighboring lattice points. In contrast, global interaction is allowed between any pair of lattice points, and its dynamics can be represented by the mean-field theory that is equivalent to Lotka-Volterra equation. Barriers, representing habitat loss, are randomly located between adjacent lattice points with the probability p. The barrier interrupts the reproduction of the prey X, but the predators Y and Z suffer no direct damage from the barriers. It is found that the effects of barriers on both species X and Y in the two-species model are usually opposite to those in the three-species model. Namely, if extinction occurs, the influence of habitat destruction on surviving species changes dramatically. We also find that when the density p of barriers increases the two models exhibit different extinction patterns: sometimes species X goes extinct, but sometimes the predator or top predator become extinct depending on the level of barrier density. The mean-field theory adequately predicts such species extinction, but it cannot explain some of the results. We interpret the results as an indirect relation between habitat destruction and species extinction. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 114
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HABITAT DESTRUCTION SYNDROME
    BERGER, RM
    SOCIAL WORK, 1995, 40 (04) : 441 - 443
  • [32] HABITAT DESTRUCTION AND COEXISTENCE OF COMPETITORS IN A SPATIALLY REALISTIC METAPOPULATION MODEL
    MOILANEN, A
    HANSKI, I
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1995, 64 (01) : 141 - 144
  • [33] The effect of habitat destruction pattern on species persistence: A cellular model
    Dytham, C
    OIKOS, 1995, 74 (02) : 340 - 344
  • [34] INDIRECT CAUSALITY IN ECOSYSTEMS
    WIEGERT, RG
    KOZLOWSKI, J
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 124 (02): : 293 - 298
  • [35] Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges
    Wootton, JT
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2002, 48 (02) : 157 - 172
  • [36] Mitigating the Effects of Habitat Loss on Solitary Bees in Agricultural Ecosystems
    Kline, Olivia
    Joshi, Neelendra K.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [37] Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity patterns of ecosystems with resource competition
    de Lima Filho, Jose A.
    Vieira, Raphael J. A. G.
    de Souza, Carlos A. M.
    Ferreira, Fernando F.
    de Oliveira, Viviane M.
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2021, 564
  • [38] Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of predators in complex ecosystems
    O'Connor, Nessa E.
    Emmerson, Mark C.
    Crowe, Tasman P.
    Donohue, Ian
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 82 (02) : 438 - 448
  • [39] THE EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC HABITAT DISTURBANCE, HABITAT DESTRUCTION, AND GLOBAL WARMING ON SHALLOW MARINE BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA
    CULVER, SJ
    BUZAS, MA
    JOURNAL OF FORAMINIFERAL RESEARCH, 1995, 25 (03) : 204 - 211
  • [40] Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity
    Menendez, Rosa
    Gonzalez-Megias, Adela
    Collingham, Yvonne
    Fox, Richard
    Roy, David B.
    Ohlemuller, Ralf
    Thomas, C. D.
    ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (03) : 605 - 611