Geomechanical properties of coal macerals; measurements applicable to modelling swelling of coal seams during CO2 sequestration

被引:25
|
作者
Fender, Thomas D. [1 ]
Rouainia, Mohamed [2 ]
Van der Land, Cees [1 ]
Jones, Martin [1 ]
Mastalerz, Maria [3 ]
Hennissen, Jan A., I [4 ]
Graham, Samuel P. [2 ]
Wagner, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Indiana Geol & Water Survey, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] British Geol Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, Notts, England
[5] Heriot Watt Univ, Lyell Ctr, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Atomic force microscopy; Maceral Young's modulus; Carbon sequestration; Coal swelling; Inertinite; Liptinite; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; GAS-ADSORPTION; ORGANIC-MATTER; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; CARBON-DIOXIDE; ALBANY SHALE; PERMEABILITY; MODULUS; RANK; NANOINDENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2020.103528
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Understanding the mechanical response of coal to CO2 injection is necessary to determine the suitability of a seam for carbon capture and underground storage (CCUS). The bulk elastic properties of a coal or shale, which determine its mechanical response, are controlled by the elastic properties of its individual components, i.e. macerals and minerals. The elastic properties of minerals are relatively well understood, and attempts have been made previously to acquire maceral elastic properties (Young's modulus) by means of nanoindentation. However, due to the resolution of a nanoindent and small size of macerals, the response is likely to be from a combination of macerals composition and minerals. Here atomic force microscopy is used for the first time to give a unique understanding of the local Youngs modulus of individual macerals, with a precision of 10 nm in both immature and mature coals/shale. Alginite, cutinite, inertinite and sporinite macerals are analysed from a samples of cannel coal (rich in cutinite), paper coal (enriched in sporinite), Northumberland coal (higher rank coal, rich in vitrinite and inertinite) and alginite rich New Albany Shale. Initial findings on the New Albany Shale indicate that kerogen isolation is not a suitable preparation technique for atomic force microscopy and as such, no alginite maceral moduli are accurately reported. Therefore results of the coal derived macerals (cutinite, inertinite and sporinite) are included in this study. The results at this length scale indicate that the mean and modal Young's modulus values in all coal macerals is less than 10 GPa. This range is similar to Young's modulus values acquired by nanoindentation within previous studies. A major difference is that the modal modulus values obtained here are significantly lower than the modal values obtained within previous studies. Thermally immature liptinite macerals (cutinite/sporinite) have a lower modal modulus (1.35-2.97GPa) than the inertinites (1.44-3.42 GPa) from the same coal. The modulus response is also non-normally distributed and most likely conforms to a gamma distribution with shape parameter between 1.5 and 2.5. The modal Young's modulus of all macerals increases with maturity, but not at the same rate, whereby the liptinite macerals become stiffer than the inertinites by the dry gas window (1.56 % Ro in Northumberland Coal). Modelling of volumetric strain under CO2 injection indicates an inversely proportionate relationship to Young's modulus, which suggests that differential swelling is more likely to occur in immature coals. It is therefore preferable to target mature coals for CCUS, as the reaction of macerals at higher maturities is more predictable across an entire coal seam.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influences of CO2 Injection into Deep Coal Seams: A Review
    Perera, Mandadige Samintha Anne
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (10) : 10324 - 10334
  • [42] Multiscale Fractal Characterization of Pore-Fracture Structure of Tectonically Deformed Coal Compared to Primary Undeformed Coal: Implications for CO2 Geological Sequestration in Coal Seams
    Zhang, Kun
    Liu, Huihu
    Ma, Mengya
    Xu, Hongjie
    Fang, Huihuang
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [43] Formation of HCN and NH3 during coal macerals pyrolysis and gasification with CO2
    Xie, KC
    Lin, JY
    Li, WY
    Chang, LP
    Feng, J
    Zhao, W
    FUEL, 2005, 84 (2-3) : 271 - 277
  • [44] Experimental Research on the Law of Energy Conversion during CO2 Sequestration in Coal
    Gao, Tao
    Deng, Cunbao
    Han, Qing
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (23)
  • [45] Influence of CO2 Exposure on High-Pressure Methane and CO2 Adsorption on Various Rank Coals: Implications for CO2 Sequestration in Coal Seams
    Wang, Qianqian
    Zhang, Dengfeng
    Wang, Haohao
    Jiang, Wenping
    Wu, Xiuping
    Yang, Jin
    Huo, Peili
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2015, 29 (06) : 3785 - 3795
  • [46] Heterogeneous sorption and swelling in a confined and stressed coal during CO2 injection
    Karacan, CÖ
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2003, 17 (06) : 1595 - 1608
  • [47] Hydromechanical Impacts of CO2 Storage in Coal Seams of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland)
    Wetzel, Maria
    Otto, Christopher
    Chen, Min
    Masum, Shakil
    Thomas, Hywel
    Urych, Tomasz
    Bezak, Bartlomiej
    Kempka, Thomas
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (07)
  • [48] Effects of SO2 and pH Concentration on CO2 Adsorption Capacity in Coal Seams for CO2 Sequestration With Considerations for Flue Gas From Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Huy, P. Q.
    Sasaki, K.
    Sugai, Y.
    Kiga, T.
    Fujioka, M.
    Adachi, T.
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 48 (10): : 58 - 63
  • [49] The Extraction Effect of Supercritical CO2 on Coal Organic Matter Based on CO2 Sequestration in Unmineable Coal Seam
    Jiang, Renxia
    Yu, Hongguan
    MINERALS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [50] Interactions of dynamic supercritical CO2 fluid with different rank moisture-equilibrated coals: Implications for CO2 sequestration in coal seams
    Zichao Hu
    Chao Li
    Dengfeng Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 35 (07) : 288 - 301