The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluations' fairness

被引:69
作者
Dulebohn, JH [1 ]
Ferris, GR
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Sch Business Adm, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5465/256920
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The present study examined the impact of employees' use of influence tactics on their evaluations of the fairness of the performance evaluation process, Results indicated that the use of supervisor-focused influence tactics was associated with positive procedural justice evaluations, but the use of job-focused influence tactics was associated with negative evaluations. Also, employees' perceptions of decision control and opportunity for formal voice were found to moderate the relationship between influence tactics and procedural justice.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 303
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]  
Mintzberg H., 1983, POWER ORG
[42]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS - DO FAIRNESS PERCEPTIONS INFLUENCE EMPLOYEE CITIZENSHIP [J].
MOORMAN, RH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (06) :845-855
[43]  
Runkel P.J., 1972, Research on Human Behavior: A Systematic Guide to Method, Vfirst
[44]  
Sheppard B.H., 1992, ORG JUSTICE
[45]   WORKERS EVALUATIONS OF THE ENDS AND THE MEANS - AN EXAMINATION OF 4 MODELS OF DISTRIBUTIVE AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE [J].
SWEENEY, PD ;
MCFARLIN, DB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 55 (01) :23-40
[46]  
Tedeschi J.T., 1984, Research in the sociology of organizations, V3, P31
[47]   EXIT, VOICE AND LOYALTY - RESPONSES TO DECLINE IN FIRMS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND STATES - HIRSCHMAN,AO [J].
TULLOCK, G .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1970, 25 (05) :1194-1195
[49]   THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED INJUSTICE ON THE ENDORSEMENT OF POLITICAL LEADERS [J].
TYLER, TR ;
RASINSKI, KA ;
MCGRAW, KM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 15 (08) :700-725
[50]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE - A TEST OF THE GROUP-VALUE MODEL [J].
TYLER, TR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (05) :830-838