The relationship between measures of fear of humans and lameness in broiler chicken flocks

被引:33
|
作者
Vasdal, G. [1 ]
Moe, R. O. [2 ]
de Jong, I. C. [3 ]
Granquist, E. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Meat & Poultry Res Ctr, Lorenveien 38, N-0513 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Vet Med, POB 8146 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
[3] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler; fear; humans; lameness; Welfare Quality; DOMESTIC CHICKS; LAYING HENS; BEHAVIOR; WELFARE; RESPONSES; CARPROFEN; CONTACT; POULTRY; TESTS; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731117001434
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the Welfare Quality((R)) assessment protocol for broilers, the touch test is included to assess the human-animal relationship in the flock. The test is designed to measure the animals' fear of humans, assuming that broilers will withdraw from the observer if they are fearful. However, many broilers close to slaughter age have impaired walking ability, and the results from the touch test may thus be biased by lameness and poor leg health. As the touch test is currently being used in several countries to assess human-animal relationship in broilers, there is an urgent need to examine this potential relationship for a further validation of the test. In the present study, fear of humans was assessed in 50 randomly selected Norwegian broiler flocks, using the touch test as described in the Welfare Quality((R)) protocol for ty broilers. Leg health was assessed by examining the gait of 150 random birds in each of the flocks, using a six-point gait score scale from 0 to 5. The coefficient for the relationship between touch test score and gait score was 0.034 (P<0.001), indicating that the animals express less fear as assessed by the touch test when the gait scores increase. This implies that the touch test may be confounded by impaired walking ability and therefore might be a suboptimal method of assessing fear of humans and human-animal relationship in broilers. In conclusion, the results from this study suggests that the touch test must be further validated in broilers and perhaps be replaced with a fear test that doesn't rely on walking ability.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COLONIZATION OF BROILERS WITH CAMPYLOBACTER IN CONVENTIONAL BROILER-CHICKEN FLOCKS
    ENGVALL, A
    BERGQVIST, A
    SANDSTEDT, K
    DANIELSSONTHAM, ML
    ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 27 (04) : 540 - 547
  • [12] SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM OUTBREAK IN BROILER CHICKEN FLOCKS IN MEXICO
    PADRON, M
    AVIAN DISEASES, 1990, 34 (01) : 221 - 223
  • [14] IMPORTANCE OF ACUTE DEATH SYNDROME IN MORTALITIES IN BROILER CHICKEN FLOCKS
    STEELE, P
    EDGAR, J
    AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1982, 58 (02) : 63 - 66
  • [15] Evaluation of the immunological status of chicken broiler flocks in the Eastern Poland
    Kozdrun, W
    Samorek-Salamonowicz, E
    Rzedzicki, J
    Tokarzewski, S
    Bos, M
    Czekaj, H
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA, 2000, 56 (07) : 461 - 464
  • [16] STUDIES ON THE DISSEMINATION OF SALMONELLA IN 9 BROILER-CHICKEN FLOCKS
    HIGGINS, R
    MALO, R
    RENEROBERGE, E
    GAUTHIER, R
    AVIAN DISEASES, 1982, 26 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [17] The relationship between physical activity and leg health in the broiler chicken
    Sherlock, L.
    Demmers, T. G. M.
    Goodship, A. E.
    Mccarthy, I. D.
    Wathes, C. M.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [18] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTIVE AND DIRECT MEASURES OF FEAR AROUSAL
    ZIMBARDO, PG
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1964, 68 (02): : 196 - 199
  • [19] Relationship between different enteric viral infections and the occurrence of diarrhea in broiler flocks in Jordan
    Lobani, A. M.
    Gharaibeh, S. M.
    Al-Majali, A. M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (06) : 1257 - 1261
  • [20] Associations between carcass weight uniformity and production measures on farm and at slaughter in commercial broiler flocks
    Vasdal, Guro
    Granquist, Erik Georg
    Skjerve, Eystein
    de Jong, Ingrid C.
    Berg, Charlotte
    Michel, Virginie
    Moe, Randi Oppermann
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 98 (10) : 4261 - 4268