Augmented Cross-Sectional Studies with Abbreviated Follow-up for Estimating HIV Incidence

被引:3
|
作者
Claggett, B. [1 ]
Lagakos, S. W. [1 ]
Wang, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Augmented; Cross-sectional studies; False negative; Incidence estimators; CAPTURE ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; INFECTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01632.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on a sensitive and less-sensitive test offers great advantages over the traditional cohort study. However, its use has been limited due to concerns about the false negative rate of the less-sensitive test, reflecting the phenomenon that some subjects may remain negative permanently on the less-sensitive test. Wang and Lagakos (2010, Biometrics 66, 864874) propose an augmented cross-sectional design that provides one way to estimate the size of the infected population who remain negative permanently and subsequently incorporate this information in the cross-sectional incidence estimator. In an augmented cross-sectional study, subjects who test negative on the less-sensitive test in the cross-sectional survey are followed forward for transition into the nonrecent state, at which time they would test positive on the less-sensitive test. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate length of follow-up and the size of the infected population who remain nonreactive permanently to the less-sensitive test. In this article, we assess the impact of varying follow-up time on the resulting incidence estimators from an augmented cross-sectional study, evaluate the robustness of cross-sectional estimators to assumptions about the existence and the size of the subpopulation who will remain negative permanently, and propose a new estimator based on abbreviated follow-up time (AF). Compared to the original estimator from an augmented cross-sectional study, the AF estimator allows shorter follow-up time and does not require estimation of the mean window period, defined as the average time between detectability of HIV infection with the sensitive and less-sensitive tests. It is shown to perform well in a wide range of settings. We discuss when the AF estimator would be expected to perform well and offer design considerations for an augmented cross-sectional study with abbreviated follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 74
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Calculating incidence in cross-sectional studies Reply
    Lucca, J. M.
    Ramesh, M.
    Parthasarathi, G.
    Ram, D.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 62 (01) : 52 - 52
  • [22] Spacing of follow-up waves in incidence studies
    Hui, SL
    Gao, S
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (11-12) : 1567 - 1575
  • [23] Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in an evolving epidemic
    Morrison, Doug
    Laeyendecker, Oliver
    Brookmeyer, Ron
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (19) : 3614 - 3627
  • [24] On the Use of Adjusted Cross-Sectional Estimators of HIV Incidence
    Wang, Rui
    Lagakos, Stephen W.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2009, 52 (05) : 538 - 547
  • [25] Clinical outcomes in multifocal motor neuropathy A combined cross-sectional and follow-up study
    Herraets, Ingrid
    van Rosmalen, Marieke
    Bos, Jeroen
    van Eijk, Ruben
    Cats, Elies
    Jongbloed, Bas
    Vlam, Lotte
    Piepers, Sanne
    Van Asseldonk, Jan-Thies
    Goedee, H. Stephan
    van den Berg, Leonard
    van der Pol, W. Ludo
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 95 (14) : E1979 - E1987
  • [26] Endometrial cancer patients' preferences for follow-up after treatment: A cross-sectional survey
    Beaver, Kinta
    Williamson, Susan
    Sutton, Chris J.
    Gardner, Anne
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2020, 45
  • [27] Gaps in patient-centered follow-up cancer care: A cross-sectional study
    Hobden, Breanne
    Turon, Heidi
    Waller, Amy
    Carey, Mariko
    Proietto, Anthony
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 32 - 33
  • [28] Prediabetes screening, treatment, and follow-up in primary health care: a cross-sectional survey
    Harcke, Katri
    Graue, Marit
    Skinner, Timothy Charles
    Olsson, Christina B.
    Stattin, Nouha Saleh
    PRACTICAL DIABETES, 2022, 39 (06) : 17 - 23
  • [29] A cross-sectional follow-up study of physical activity in adults with moderate and severe haemophilia
    Kennedy, Megan
    Roche, Sheila
    McGowan, Mark
    Larkin, Niamh
    O'Connell, Niamh M.
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Lavin, Michelle
    O'Donnell, James S.
    Turecek, Peter L.
    Gormley, John
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2023, 29 (03) : 892 - 899
  • [30] Prevalence of long COVID symptoms in Haryana, India: a cross-sectional follow-up study
    Chaudhry, Dhruva
    Khandelwal, Shweta
    Bahadur, Chandrika
    Daniels, Benjamin
    Bhattacharyya, Malay
    Gangakhedkar, Raman
    Desai, Sapna
    Das, Jishnu
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2024, 25