Augmented Cross-Sectional Studies with Abbreviated Follow-up for Estimating HIV Incidence

被引:3
|
作者
Claggett, B. [1 ]
Lagakos, S. W. [1 ]
Wang, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Augmented; Cross-sectional studies; False negative; Incidence estimators; CAPTURE ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; INFECTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01632.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on a sensitive and less-sensitive test offers great advantages over the traditional cohort study. However, its use has been limited due to concerns about the false negative rate of the less-sensitive test, reflecting the phenomenon that some subjects may remain negative permanently on the less-sensitive test. Wang and Lagakos (2010, Biometrics 66, 864874) propose an augmented cross-sectional design that provides one way to estimate the size of the infected population who remain negative permanently and subsequently incorporate this information in the cross-sectional incidence estimator. In an augmented cross-sectional study, subjects who test negative on the less-sensitive test in the cross-sectional survey are followed forward for transition into the nonrecent state, at which time they would test positive on the less-sensitive test. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate length of follow-up and the size of the infected population who remain nonreactive permanently to the less-sensitive test. In this article, we assess the impact of varying follow-up time on the resulting incidence estimators from an augmented cross-sectional study, evaluate the robustness of cross-sectional estimators to assumptions about the existence and the size of the subpopulation who will remain negative permanently, and propose a new estimator based on abbreviated follow-up time (AF). Compared to the original estimator from an augmented cross-sectional study, the AF estimator allows shorter follow-up time and does not require estimation of the mean window period, defined as the average time between detectability of HIV infection with the sensitive and less-sensitive tests. It is shown to perform well in a wide range of settings. We discuss when the AF estimator would be expected to perform well and offer design considerations for an augmented cross-sectional study with abbreviated follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 74
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Augmented Cross-Sectional Prevalence Testing for Estimating HIV Incidence
    Wang, Rui
    Lagakos, Stephen W.
    BIOMETRICS, 2010, 66 (03) : 864 - 874
  • [2] A new method for estimating HIV incidence from a single cross-sectional survey
    Fellows, Ian E.
    Shiraishi, Ray W.
    Cherutich, Peter
    Achia, Thomas
    Young, Peter W.
    Kim, Andrea A.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [3] Sample Size Methods for Estimating HIV Incidence from Cross-Sectional Surveys
    Konikoff, Jacob
    Brookmeyer, Ron
    BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (04) : 1121 - 1129
  • [4] Estimating cholera incidence with cross-sectional serology
    Azman, Andrew S.
    Lessler, Justin
    Luquero, Francisco J.
    Bhuiyan, Taufiqur Rahman
    Khan, Ashraful Islam
    Chowdhury, Fahima
    Kabir, Alamgir
    Gurwith, Marc
    Weil, Ana A.
    Harris, Jason B.
    Calderwood, Stephen B.
    Ryan, Edward T.
    Qadri, Firdausi
    Leung, Daniel T.
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 11 (480)
  • [5] Comparison of HIV type 1 incidence observed during longitudinal follow-up with incidence estimated by cross-sectional analysis using the BED capture enzyme immunoassay
    McDougal, J. Steven
    Parekh, Bharat S.
    Peterson, Michael L.
    Branson, Bernard M.
    Dobbs, Trudy
    Ackers, Marta
    Gurwith, Marc
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2006, 22 (10) : 945 - 952
  • [6] Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms
    Karsten Papke
    Friedhelm Brassel
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 2051 - 2066
  • [7] Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms
    Papke, Karsten
    Brassel, Friedhelm
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (09) : 2051 - 2066
  • [8] Calculating incidence in cross-sectional studies
    Raina, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 62 (01) : 51 - +
  • [9] Randomized controlled comparison of cross-sectional survey approaches to optimize follow-up completeness in clinical studies
    von Allmen, Regula S.
    Tinner, Christian
    Schmidli, Jurg
    Tevaearai, Hendrik T.
    Dick, Florian
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [10] Estimating HIV Incidence for Identification of Microbicide Trial Sites in India: A Cross-sectional Study
    Chandhiok, Nomita
    Paranjape, Ramesh S.
    Mehendale, Sanjay M.
    Beri, Archana
    Chauhan, Sanjay
    Kumar, R. Hari
    Sahay, Seema
    Washington, Reynold
    Callahan, Marianne
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2014, 30 : A215 - A215