Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture

被引:42
|
作者
Schmidt, Jake [1 ]
Helme, Ned [1 ]
Lee, Jin [1 ]
Houdashelt, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC 20002 USA
关键词
climate change; developing countries; energy-intensity benchmark; financial incentives; no-lose target; post-2012; sector emissions; technology transfer;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2007.0321
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A sectoral approach to GHG emissions reductions in developing countries is proposed as a key component of the post-2012 climate change mitigation framework. In this approach, the ten highest-emitting developing countries in the electricity and other major industrial sectors pledge to meet voluntary, 'no-lose' GHG emissions targets in these sectors. No penalties are incurred for failing to meet a target, but emissions reductions achieved beyond the target level earn emissions reduction credits (ERCs) that can be sold to industrialized nations. Participating developing countries establish initial 'no-lose' emissions targets, based upon their national circumstances, from sector-specific energy-intensity benchmarks that have been developed by independent experts. Industrialized nations then offer incentives for the developing countries to adopt more stringent emissions targets through a 'Technology Finance and Assistance Package', which helps to overcome financial and other barriers to technology transfer and deployment. These sector-specific energy-intensity benchmarks could also serve as a means for establishing national economy-wide targets in developed countries in the post-2012 regime. Preliminary modelling of a hybrid scenario, in which Annex I countries adopt economy-wide absolute GHG emissions targets and high-emitting developing countries adopt 'no-lose' sectoral targets, indicates that such an approach significantly improves the likelihood that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 can be stabilized at 450 ppmv by the end of the century.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 515
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Including adaptation costs and climate change damages in evaluating post-2012 burden-sharing regimes
    Andries F. Hof
    Michel G. J. den Elzen
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15 : 19 - 40
  • [22] Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies
    Rafaj, Peter
    Schoepp, Wolfgang
    Russ, Peter
    Heyes, Chris
    Amann, Markus
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (06) : 801 - 824
  • [23] The Montreal Climate Summit: Starting the Kyoto Business and Preparing for post-2012
    Wittneben, Bettina
    Sterk, Wolfgang
    Ott, Hermann E.
    Brouns, Bernd
    JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING LAW, 2006, 3 (02) : 90 - 100
  • [24] US climate mitigation pathways post-2012: Transition scenarios in ADAGE
    Ross, Martin T.
    Fawcett, Allen A.
    Clapp, Christa S.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S212 - S222
  • [25] Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies
    Peter Rafaj
    Wolfgang Schöpp
    Peter Russ
    Chris Heyes
    Markus Amann
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, 18 : 801 - 824
  • [26] Sector-Based Policy Generation and Enforcement for Cognitive Radios
    Hilburn, Benjamin
    Newman, Timothy R.
    Bose, Tamal
    MILCOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 388 - 394
  • [27] A Clean Development Mechanism with global atmospheric benefits for a post-2012 climate regime
    Lambert Schneider
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2009, 9 : 95 - 111
  • [28] A Clean Development Mechanism with global atmospheric benefits for a post-2012 climate regime
    Schneider, Lambert
    INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 9 (02) : 95 - 111
  • [29] Long-term goals and post-2012 commitments: where do we go from here with climate policy?
    Morlot, JC
    Smith, J
    Agrawala, S
    Franck, T
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2005, 5 (03) : 251 - 272