Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture

被引:42
|
作者
Schmidt, Jake [1 ]
Helme, Ned [1 ]
Lee, Jin [1 ]
Houdashelt, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC 20002 USA
关键词
climate change; developing countries; energy-intensity benchmark; financial incentives; no-lose target; post-2012; sector emissions; technology transfer;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2007.0321
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A sectoral approach to GHG emissions reductions in developing countries is proposed as a key component of the post-2012 climate change mitigation framework. In this approach, the ten highest-emitting developing countries in the electricity and other major industrial sectors pledge to meet voluntary, 'no-lose' GHG emissions targets in these sectors. No penalties are incurred for failing to meet a target, but emissions reductions achieved beyond the target level earn emissions reduction credits (ERCs) that can be sold to industrialized nations. Participating developing countries establish initial 'no-lose' emissions targets, based upon their national circumstances, from sector-specific energy-intensity benchmarks that have been developed by independent experts. Industrialized nations then offer incentives for the developing countries to adopt more stringent emissions targets through a 'Technology Finance and Assistance Package', which helps to overcome financial and other barriers to technology transfer and deployment. These sector-specific energy-intensity benchmarks could also serve as a means for establishing national economy-wide targets in developed countries in the post-2012 regime. Preliminary modelling of a hybrid scenario, in which Annex I countries adopt economy-wide absolute GHG emissions targets and high-emitting developing countries adopt 'no-lose' sectoral targets, indicates that such an approach significantly improves the likelihood that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 can be stabilized at 450 ppmv by the end of the century.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 515
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three Key Elements of a Post-2012 International Climate Policy Architecture
    Olmstead, Sheila M.
    Stavins, Robert N.
    REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2012, 6 (01) : 65 - +
  • [2] Post-2012 climate policy dilemmas: a review of proposals
    Kuik, Onno
    Aerts, Jeroen
    Berkhout, Frans
    Biermann, Frank
    Bruggink, Jos
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    Tol, Richard S. J.
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 (03) : 317 - 336
  • [3] Issues and options for the post-2012 climate architecture - An overview
    Michaelowa A.
    Tangen K.
    Hasselknippe H.
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2005, 5 (1) : 5 - 24
  • [4] Adaptation can help mitigation: an integrated approach to post-2012 climate policy
    Bosello, Francesco
    Carraro, Carlo
    De Cian, Enrica
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 18 (03) : 270 - 290
  • [5] Incorporating cities into the post-2012 climate change agreements
    Lefevre, Benoit
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2012, 24 (02) : 575 - 595
  • [6] Graduation and deepening: An ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario
    Michaelowa A.
    Butzengeiger S.
    Jung M.
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2005, 5 (1) : 25 - 46
  • [7] Nuclear power and post-2012 energy and climate change policies
    Weisser, Daniel
    Howells, Mark
    Rogner, Hans-Holyer
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (06) : 467 - 477
  • [8] What Role for Trade in a Post-2012 Global Climate Policy Regime
    Whalley, John
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2011, 34 (11): : 1844 - 1862
  • [9] Sectoral approaches for a post-2012 climate regime: a taxonomy
    Meckling, Jonas O.
    Chung, Gu Yoon
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2009, 9 (06) : 652 - 668
  • [10] Assessment of Acceptable Swiss post-2012 Climate Policies
    André Sceia
    Juan-Carlos Altamirano-Cabrera
    Marc Vielle
    Nicolas Weidmann
    Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2012, 148 (2) : 347 - 380