Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection

被引:17
|
作者
Viala, Marie [1 ]
Vinches, Marie [1 ]
Alexandre, Marie [1 ]
Mollevi, Caroline [1 ]
Durigova, Anna [2 ]
Hayaoui, Nadia [1 ]
Homicsko, Krisztian [3 ]
Cuenant, Alice [1 ]
Gongora, Celine [4 ]
Gianni, Luca [5 ]
Tosi, Diego [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Montpellier, Montpellier, France
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] CHU Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] INSERM, U1194, Inst Rech Cancerol Montpellier, Montpellier, France
[5] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
mAbs; first-in-human trials; non first-in-human trials; recommended dose; maximum administered dose; PHASE-II TRIAL; CELL LUNG-CANCER; ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; REFRACTORY ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTS; HUMANIZED ANTI-CCR4 ANTIBODY;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2017.473
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Our previous survey on first-in-human trials (FIHT) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed that, due to their limited toxicity, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was only tentatively defined. Methods: We identified, by MEDLINE search, articles on single-agent trials of mAbs with an FIHT included in our previous survey. For each mAb, we examined tested dose(s) and dose selection rationale in non-FIHTs (NFIHTs). We also assessed the correlation between doses tested in the registration trials (RTs) of all FDA-approved mAbs and the corresponding FIHT results. Results: In the 37 dose-escalation NFIHTs, the RP2D indication was still poorly defined. In phase II-III NFIHTs (n = 103 on 37 mAbs), the FIHT RP2D was the only dose tested for five mAbs. For 16 mAbs, only doses different from the FIHT RP2D or the maximum administered dose (MAD) were tested and the dose selection rationale infrequently indicated. In the 60 RTs on 27 FDA-approved mAbs with available FIHT, the FIHT RP2D was tested only for two mAbs, and RT doses were much lower than the FIHT MAD. Conclusions: The rationale beyond dose selection in phase II and III trials of mAbs is often unclear in published articles and not based on FIHT data.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 697
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Industry Perspective on First-in-Human and Clinical Pharmacology Strategies to Support Clinical Development of T-Cell Engaging Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Therapy
    Nagaraja Shastri, Prathap
    Shah, Nirav
    Lechmann, Martin
    Mody, Hardik
    Retter, Marc W.
    Zhu, Min
    Li, Tommy
    Wang, Jun
    Shaik, Naveed
    Zheng, Xirong
    Ovacik, Meric
    Hua, Fei
    Jawa, Vibha
    Boetsch, Christophe
    Cao, Yanguang
    Burke, John
    Datta, Kaushik
    Gadkar, Kapil
    Upreti, Vijay
    Betts, Alison
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 117 (01) : 34 - 55
  • [22] Use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics
    Agoram, Balaji M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 67 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [23] First-in-Human Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Doses of NTM-1633, a Novel Mixture of Monoclonal Antibodies against Botulinum Toxin E
    Raja, S. M.
    Guptill, J. T.
    Juel, V. C.
    Walter, E. B.
    Cohen-Wolkowiez, M.
    Hill, H.
    Sendra, E.
    Hauser, B.
    Jackson, P.
    Tomic, M.
    Espinoza, Y.
    Swamy, G. K.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 66 (04)
  • [24] Choice of Starting Dose for Molecularly Targeted Agents Evaluated in First-in-Human Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
    Le Tourneau, Christophe
    Stathis, Anastasios
    Vidal, Laura
    Moore, Malcolm J.
    Siu, Lillian L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (08) : 1401 - 1407
  • [25] Planning of dosing regimen and schedule of assessments for first in human oncology clinical trials for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
    Bernstein, Galina
    Oldenhof, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (07)
  • [26] Commentary on the EMA Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products
    van Gerven, Joop
    Bonelli, Milton
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (07) : 1401 - 1409
  • [27] AN INTEGRATED FIRST-IN-HUMAN STUDY DESIGN INVOLVING SEQUENTIAL SINGLE AND MULTIPLE ASCENDING DOSE COHORTS: AN EMERGING TREND IN PHASE I CLINICAL TRIALS
    Francis, M.
    Basque, J.
    Legault, E.
    Rufiange, M.
    Sicard, E.
    Lefebvre, M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 93 : S20 - S21
  • [28] Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data-Driven and Risk-Based Approach in the Selection of First-in-Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment
    Leach, Michael W.
    Clarke, David O.
    Dudal, Sherri
    Han, Chao
    Li, Chunze
    Yang, Zheng
    Brennan, Frank R.
    Bailey, Wendy J.
    Chen, Yingxue
    Deslandes, Antoine
    Loberg, Lise I.
    Mayawala, Kapil
    Rogge, Mark C.
    Todd, Marque
    Chemuturi, Nagendra V.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 109 (06) : 1395 - 1415
  • [29] Selection of first-in-human starting dose of anti-OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody BMS-986178 using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based approach
    Huang, Christine
    Feng, Yan
    Barnhart, Bryan
    Quigley, Michael
    Huber, John
    Bello, Akintunde
    Marathe, Punit
    Aanur, Praveen
    Reilly, Timothy
    Yang, Zheng
    JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2017, 5
  • [30] On the anticipation of the human dose in first-in-man trials from preclinical and prior clinical information in early drug development
    Lowe, P. J.
    Hijazi, Y.
    Luttringer, O.
    Yin, H.
    Sarangapani, R.
    Howard, D.
    XENOBIOTICA, 2007, 37 (10-11) : 1331 - 1354