Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device

被引:68
|
作者
Bekar, A. [1 ]
Dogan, S. [1 ]
Abas, F. [1 ]
Caner, B. [1 ]
Korfali, G. [2 ]
Kocaeli, H. [1 ]
Yilmazlar, S. [1 ]
Korfali, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia & Reanimat, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Complications; Fiberoptic device; Intracranial pressure; Monitoring; BRAIN-TISSUE PRESSURE; HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; AGGRESSIVE TREATMENT; EXPERIENCE; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2008.02.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We prospectively investigated the complications associated with intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring using the Camino intracranial pressure device. A fiberoptic ICP monitoring transducer was implanted in 631 patients. About half of the patients (n = 303) also received an external ventricular drainage set (EVDS). The durations (mean +/- SD) of ICP monitoring in patients without and with an EVDS were 6.5 +/- 4.4 and 7.3 +/- 5.1 days, respectively. Infection occurred in 6 patients with only an ICP transducer (6/328, 1.8%) and 24 patients with an EVDS also (24/303, 7.9%). The duration of monitoring had no effect on infection, whereas the use of an EVDS for more than 9 days increased infection risk by 5.11 times. Other complications included transducer disconnection (2.37%), epidural hematoma (0.47%), contusion (0.47%), defective probe (0.31%), broken transducer (0.31%), dislocation of the fixation screw (0.15%), and intraparenchymal hematoma (0.15%). In conclusion, intraparenchymal ICP monitoring systems can be safely used in patients who either have, or are at risk of developing, increased ICP. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSESSMENT OF LEEDS DEVICE FOR MONITORING INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE
    DEARDEN, NM
    MCDOWALL, DG
    GIBSON, RM
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1984, 60 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device
    R. Stendel
    J. Heidenreich
    A. Schilling
    R. Akhavan-Sigari
    R. Kurth
    T. Picht
    T. Pietilä
    O. Suess
    C. Kern
    J. Meisel
    M. Brock
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2003, 145 : 185 - 193
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device
    Stendel, R
    Heidenreich, J
    Schilling, A
    Akhavan-Sigari, R
    Kurth, R
    Picht, T
    Pietilä, T
    Suess, O
    Kern, C
    Meisel, J
    Brock, M
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2003, 145 (03) : 185 - 193
  • [24] FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY AND INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE
    BAJWA, M
    KAMHOLZ, SL
    CHEST, 1994, 105 (06) : 1909 - 1909
  • [25] RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING IN 303 CHILDREN
    POPLE, IK
    MUHLBAUER, MS
    SANFORD, RA
    KIRK, E
    PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 23 (02) : 64 - 67
  • [27] INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS ARE NOT RELATED TO DURATION OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING
    KANTER, RK
    WEINER, LB
    PATTI, AM
    ROBSON, LK
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1985, 19 (04) : A143 - A143
  • [28] Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care
    Tavakoli, Samon
    Peitz, Geoffrey
    Ares, William
    Hafeez, Shaheryar
    Grandhi, Ramesh
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2017, 43 (05)
  • [29] Intracranial pressure monitoring: Cost-benefit analysis of ventricular catheters and fiberoptic systems
    Basauri, L
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 7 (03) : 165 - 168
  • [30] An avoidable methodological failure in intracranial pressure monitoring using fiberoptic or solid state devices
    Raabe, A
    Stockel, R
    Hohrein, D
    Schoche, J
    INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE AND NEUROMONITORING IN BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 71 : 59 - 61